Suppr超能文献

不同足部和踝关节固定方法下的行走能量消耗

Energy cost of ambulation with different methods of foot and ankle immobilization.

作者信息

Fowler P T, Botte M J, Mathewson J W, Speth S R, Byrne T P, Sutherland D H

机构信息

University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 1993 May;11(3):416-21. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100110314.

Abstract

In order to measure the energy cost of immobilization of the foot and ankle during ambulation, 14 healthy male volunteers exercised while wearing various immobilization devices. Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost, cardiac output, minute ventilation, heart rate, stroke volume, stride length, and stride frequency were determined at a steady state of exercise as the subjects walked on a treadmill at 80 m/min (equivalent to the comfortable walking speed of approximately 3 mi/h). Each subject was tested with three different types of immobilization devices: a short leg walking cast, a prefabricated lower leg orthosis, and a rigid-soled surgical shoe. The results were compared with those for the same men ambulating without an immobilization device. Ambulation with the short leg walking cast and the prefabricated lower leg orthosis required significantly more energy in comparison with control values (all p values < 0.006) in terms of oxygen cost, cardiac index, oxygen consumption, and minute ventilation. However, when the rigid-soled surgical shoe was worn, energy consumption as measured by all parameters was not significantly increased compared with control values. Comparison of the findings for the short leg walking cast and the prefabricated lower leg orthosis showed no significant differences in any parameter of energy consumption. Stride length, however, was significantly shorter in the short leg walking cast compared with all immobilizers tested.

摘要

为了测量步行过程中足部和踝关节固定的能量消耗,14名健康男性志愿者在佩戴各种固定装置的情况下进行运动。当受试者以80米/分钟(相当于约3英里/小时的舒适步行速度)在跑步机上行走时,在运动稳定状态下测定耗氧量、氧耗、心输出量、分钟通气量、心率、每搏输出量、步长和步频。每位受试者使用三种不同类型的固定装置进行测试:短腿行走石膏、预制小腿矫形器和硬底手术鞋。将结果与这些男性在不使用固定装置行走时的结果进行比较。与对照组相比,使用短腿行走石膏和预制小腿矫形器行走在氧耗、心脏指数、耗氧量和分钟通气量方面需要显著更多的能量(所有p值<0.006)。然而,当穿着硬底手术鞋时,所有参数测量的能量消耗与对照组相比没有显著增加。短腿行走石膏和预制小腿矫形器的研究结果比较表明,在任何能量消耗参数上均无显著差异。然而,与所有测试的固定器相比,短腿行走石膏的步长明显更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验