Scott K R, Edafiogho I O, Richardson E L, Farrar V A, Moore J A, Tietz E I, Hinko C N, Chang H, el-Assadi A, Nicholson J M
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy and Pharmacal Sciences, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059.
J Med Chem. 1993 Jul 9;36(14):1947-55. doi: 10.1021/jm00066a003.
This report continues the in-depth evaluation of methyl 4-[(p-chlorophenyl)amino]-6-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-en-1-oate , 1 (ADD 196022), and methyl 4-(benzylamino)-6-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-en-1-oate, 2, two potent anticonvulsant enaminones. These compounds were evaluated employing the amygdala kindling model. Neither 1 nor 2 was active against amygdala kindled seizures, further supporting the corneal kindled model as a definitive tool for antielectroshock seizure evaluation as previously reported. Additional intraperitoneal (ip) data on 1 revealed toxicity at 24 h at 100 mg/kg. Several active analogs have been prepared with the view to minimizing toxicity. In a special ip rat screen developed by the Antiepileptic Drug Development (ADD) Program, these newer analogs were evaluated for protection against maximal electroshock seizures (MES) at 10 mg/kg and neurotoxicity at 100 mg/kg. From this screen, several compounds were shown to be safer alternatives, the most notable was methyl 4-[(p-bromophenyl)amino]-6-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-en-1-oate, 13. Compound 13 had an ip ED50 of 4 mg/kg in the rat and a TD50 of 269 mg/kg, providing a protective index (TD50/ED50) of > 67. By variation in the ring size, additional aromatic substitutions and the synthesis of acyclic analogs, these newer compounds provide a more definitive insight into the structure-activity correlation. CLOGP evaluation and molecular modeling studies are also provided to further elaborate the molecular characteristics of potential anticonvulsant enaminones.
