Suppr超能文献

心脏瓣膜置换术后接受华法林治疗的患者中阿司匹林与安慰剂的比较。

A comparison of aspirin with placebo in patients treated with warfarin after heart-valve replacement.

作者信息

Turpie A G, Gent M, Laupacis A, Latour Y, Gunstensen J, Basile F, Klimek M, Hirsh J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):524-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308193290802.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of warfarin, major systemic embolism remains an important complication in patients with heart-valve replacement. Although the addition of antiplatelet agents has the potential to reduce this complication, their efficacy and safety when given in combination with warfarin are uncertain.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of adding aspirin (100 mg per day) to warfarin treatment (target international normalized ratio, 3.0 to 4.5) in 370 patients with mechanical heart valves or with tissue valves plus atrial fibrillation or a history of thromboembolism.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were randomly assigned to aspirin and 184 to placebo, and they were followed for up to 4 years (average, 2.5). Major systemic embolism or death from vascular causes occurred in 6 aspirin-treated patients (1.9 percent per year) and 24 placebo-treated patients (8.5 percent per year) (risk reduction with aspirin, 77 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 44 to 91 percent; P < 0.001). Major systemic embolism, nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage, or death from hemorrhage or vascular causes occurred in 12 patients assigned to aspirin (3.9 percent per year) and 28 patients assigned to placebo (9.9 percent per year) (risk reduction, 61 per cent; 95 percent confidence interval, 24 to 80 percent; P = 0.005); major systemic embolism or death from any cause occurred in 13 patients (4.2 percent) and 33 patients (11.7 percent), respectively (risk reduction, 65 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 33 to 82 percent; P < 0.001); and death from all causes occurred in 9 patients (2.8 percent) and 22 patients (7.4 percent), respectively (risk reduction, 63 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 83 percent; P = 0.01). Bleeding occurred in 71 patients in the aspirin group (35.0 percent), as compared with 49 patients in the placebo group (22.0 percent) (increase in risk, 55 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 8 to 124 percent; P = 0.02); major bleeding occurred in 24 and 19 patients, respectively (increase in risk, 27 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -30 to 132 percent; P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mechanical heart valves and high-risk patients with prosthetic tissue valves, the addition of aspirin to warfarin therapy reduced mortality, particularly mortality from vascular causes, together with major systemic embolism. Although there was some increase in bleeding, the risk of the combined treatment was more than offset by the considerable benefit.

摘要

背景

尽管使用了华法林,但在心脏瓣膜置换患者中,严重全身性栓塞仍是一个重要的并发症。虽然加用抗血小板药物有可能减少这一并发症,但其与华法林联合使用时的疗效和安全性尚不确定。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,我们评估了在370例机械心脏瓣膜患者或生物瓣膜合并心房颤动或有血栓栓塞病史的患者中,在华法林治疗(目标国际标准化比值为3.0至4.5)基础上加用阿司匹林(每日100毫克)的疗效和安全性。

结果

共有186例患者被随机分配至阿司匹林组,184例患者被随机分配至安慰剂组,随访时间长达4年(平均2.5年)。6例接受阿司匹林治疗的患者发生严重全身性栓塞或死于血管原因(每年1.9%),24例接受安慰剂治疗的患者发生此类情况(每年8.5%)(阿司匹林降低风险77%;95%置信区间为44%至91%;P<0.001)。12例被分配至阿司匹林组的患者发生严重全身性栓塞、非致命性颅内出血或死于出血或血管原因(每年3.9%),28例被分配至安慰剂组的患者发生此类情况(每年9.9%)(风险降低61%;95%置信区间为24%至80%;P = 0.005);分别有13例(4.2%)和33例(11.7%)患者发生严重全身性栓塞或死于任何原因(风险降低65%;95%置信区间为33%至82%;P<0.001);分别有9例(2.8%)和22例(7.4%)患者死于各种原因(风险降低63%;95%置信区间为19%至83%;P = 0.01)。阿司匹林组有71例患者发生出血(35.0%),而安慰剂组有49例患者发生出血(22.0%)(风险增加55%;95%置信区间为8%至124%;P = 0.0

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验