Monnet E, Boutron M C, Faivre J, Milan C
Départment de Santé Publique, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Besancon, France.
Cancer. 1993 Aug 15;72(4):1165-70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1165::aid-cncr2820720406>3.0.co;2-5.
The prognostic significance of the socioeconomic status of patients treated for colorectal cancer, although stated in some studies, remains controversial.
The authors studied a population-based series of 771 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed in Cote D'Or, France, between January 1976 and December 1980. Survival was studied for the first 5 years after diagnosis. The relationship between socioeconomic status, assessed by comfort of housing, and the main clinical prognostic factors was examined. The influence of comfort of housing on prognosis was studied with the Cox model, while controlling for these factors. Interactions between type of housing and other prognostic factors also were tested.
Compared with patients living in a comfortable house, patients in the medium or no-comfort categories were more likely to receive diagnosis at an advanced stage (P = 0.03) and be treated by palliative therapy (P = 0.0005). After adjustment for these factors and age, sex, place of residence, and tumor site, patients living in no comfort had a twofold higher risk of dying during the follow-up period compared with patients living in comfortable housing, with the relative risk being 1.5 for the medium comfort category (95% confidence intervals, 1.3-3.2 and 1.2-1.7, respectively). This effect was more remarkable in patients with early-stage tumors than in patients with advanced tumors.
Such findings should prompt public health measures for earlier access to care structures for people in a lower social class and research for a better understanding of the host-tumor relationship.
尽管一些研究提到了结直肠癌患者社会经济地位的预后意义,但仍存在争议。
作者研究了1976年1月至1980年12月在法国科多尔省诊断出的771例结直肠癌患者的人群队列。对诊断后的前5年生存情况进行研究。通过住房舒适度评估社会经济地位与主要临床预后因素之间的关系。在控制这些因素的同时,用Cox模型研究住房舒适度对预后的影响。还测试了住房类型与其他预后因素之间的相互作用。
与居住在舒适住房中的患者相比,中等舒适度或无舒适度类别的患者更有可能在晚期接受诊断(P = 0.03)并接受姑息治疗(P = 0.0005)。在对这些因素以及年龄、性别、居住地点和肿瘤部位进行调整后,与居住在舒适住房中的患者相比,居住在无舒适度住房中的患者在随访期间死亡风险高出两倍,中等舒适度类别的相对风险为1.5(95%置信区间分别为1.3 - 3.2和1.2 - 1.7)。这种效应在早期肿瘤患者中比晚期肿瘤患者更显著。
这些发现应促使采取公共卫生措施,使社会阶层较低的人群能更早地获得医疗服务机构,并开展研究以更好地理解宿主与肿瘤的关系。