Bertrand-Servais M, Letur-Könirsch H, Raoul-Duval A, Frydman R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.
Hum Reprod. 1993 Jun;8(6):874-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138158.
This study involved 50 patients interviewed in conversations with a psychologist. It was found that it was possible to characterize the kind of couples using assisted reproductive techniques in terms of diagnostic and psychological profile. Other observations included the repercussions of this action on the couples' stability in case of failure or success, the desire for children and the plans concerning them, the secrecy theme and questions arising from the practice of anonymous or non-anonymous oocyte donation. The relationship between recipients and donors, as well as the specific relationship between couples and their consultants, were also examined. It is concluded that the problems encountered differ according to the infertility diagnosis. Donor anonymity allows oocyte recipients to impose their own identity patterns onto the future child and to introduce him/her in an unbiased way to their own lives. Artificial techniques to assist in the conception of a child do not appear to interfere with the couple's relationship and their desire for a child, which remains constant for each member of the couple.
本研究涉及50名患者，他们接受了心理学家的访谈。研究发现，根据诊断和心理特征，可以对使用辅助生殖技术的夫妻类型进行描述。其他观察结果包括，在失败或成功的情况下，这一行为对夫妻关系稳定性的影响、对孩子的渴望以及有关孩子的计划、保密主题以及匿名或非匿名卵母细胞捐赠实践中出现的问题。还研究了受赠者与捐赠者之间的关系，以及夫妻与其咨询顾问之间的特定关系。研究得出结论，根据不孕诊断的不同，所遇到的问题也有所不同。捐赠者匿名使卵母细胞受赠者能够将自己的身份模式强加给未来的孩子，并以公正的方式将其引入自己的生活。辅助受孕的人工技术似乎不会干扰夫妻关系以及他们对孩子的渴望，夫妻双方对孩子的渴望保持不变。
