Suppr超能文献

脊柱与外周骨关节炎及骨密度测量之间的关系。

The relationship between spinal and peripheral osteoarthritis and bone density measurements.

作者信息

Belmonte-Serrano M A, Bloch D A, Lane N E, Michel B E, Fries J F

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1808.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;20(6):1005-13.

PMID:8350306
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of osteoarthritis (OA) on bone density measurements and whether OA at one site is associated with OA at other sites.

METHODS

Nonrandomized, cross sectional observational study; secondary analysis of a general population database. Sixty-four subjects derived from a longitudinal study of long distance runners and community controls had a complete peripheral radiographic evaluation for osteoarthritic changes in hands, knees, and lumbar spine. Forty-four of these were studied in 1984 with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of L1, and 54 were studied in 1988 with 153-Gd dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) in the spine and total body. Thirty-four subjects had all measurements done.

RESULTS

Total body and lumbar spine DPA were positively correlated with radiological scores of OA in the spine and knees, with coefficients ranging between 0.467 to 0.530 (p < 0.001 in all cases). This correlation was principally associated with spinal spurs and knee sclerosis. Results of stepwise multiple linear regression modeling for QCT included age, spine sclerosis, knee sclerosis and knee spurs as the main predictors of bone mineral density (BMD). For DPA measurements, spine spur score was a useful regressor for all the models. Altogether, the percentage of variance accounted for by individual radiological OA variables was 27.4% for lumbar QCT, 27.3% for lumbar BMD, 7.3% for total spine BMD, and 45.2% for total body BMD. OA scores at different sites were not correlated, although repeated assessment at the same site showed very close correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

All methods used to determine BMD showed a highly significant positive correlation between lumbar and knee radiological OA and bone mineral content both in the spine and the total body. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that OA is negatively correlated with osteopenia. OA, as seen in this population, was not a generalized condition, but rather, was site specific.

摘要

目的

确定骨关节炎(OA)对骨密度测量的影响,以及一个部位的OA是否与其他部位的OA相关。

方法

非随机横断面观察性研究;对一个普通人群数据库进行二次分析。从一项对长跑运动员和社区对照的纵向研究中选取64名受试者,对手部、膝盖和腰椎进行了全面的外周X线摄影评估,以检查骨关节炎变化。其中44名受试者于1984年接受了L1的定量计算机断层扫描(QCT),54名受试者于1988年接受了脊柱和全身的153-Gd双能光子吸收测定法(DPA)。34名受试者完成了所有测量。

结果

全身和腰椎DPA与脊柱和膝盖OA的放射学评分呈正相关,系数在0.467至0.530之间(所有情况p<0.001)。这种相关性主要与脊柱骨刺和膝盖硬化有关。QCT的逐步多元线性回归模型结果包括年龄、脊柱硬化、膝盖硬化和膝盖骨刺作为骨矿物质密度(BMD)的主要预测因素。对于DPA测量,脊柱骨刺评分是所有模型的一个有用回归变量。总体而言,各个放射学OA变量所解释的方差百分比,腰椎QCT为27.4%,腰椎BMD为27.3%,全脊柱BMD为7.3%,全身BMD为45.2%。不同部位的OA评分不相关,尽管在同一部位重复评估显示相关性非常紧密。

结论

所有用于确定BMD的方法均显示,腰椎和膝盖放射学OA与脊柱和全身的骨矿物质含量之间存在高度显著的正相关。因此,我们的结果支持OA与骨质减少呈负相关的假设。在该人群中观察到的OA并非全身性疾病,而是具有部位特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验