Hayashi S, Yokota K, Takizawa Y, Tomizawa I, Nejime T, Oguma K
Department of Microbiology, Sapporo Medical College, Hokkaido, Japan.
Microbiol Immunol. 1993;37(4):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1993.tb03210.x.
Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were developed to detect immunoglobulin G and M antibodies to group A streptococcal (GAS) antigens, streptolysin O, streptokinase, and group A carbohydrate. The sensitivities and the specificities of the IgM capture ELISAs to each GAS antigen were high enough to distinguish the patients with GAS infections (diagnosed as GAS pharyngitis or scarlet fever) from the control groups (healthy people and patients with pharyngitis from whom GAS could not be isolated). On the other hand, the specificities of the IgG capture ELISAs were not very effective in diagnosis of GAS infections. When the capture ELISA and an indirect ELISA detecting IgM antibodies to group A carbohydrate were compared, false-positive reactions due to rheumatoid factor occurred in the indirect ELISA, but did not occur in the capture ELISA. These results indicate that the capture ELISA works better than the indirect ELISA in detecting the IgM antibody, and that the IgM capture ELISA to GAS antigen provides a rapid and highly reliable serodiagnosis for GAS infections employing only a single serum.
捕获酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)被开发用于检测抗A组链球菌(GAS)抗原、链球菌溶血素O、链激酶和A组碳水化合物的免疫球蛋白G和M抗体。针对每种GAS抗原的IgM捕获ELISA的敏感性和特异性足够高,能够将GAS感染患者(诊断为GAS咽炎或猩红热)与对照组(健康人和无法分离出GAS的咽炎患者)区分开来。另一方面,IgG捕获ELISA在GAS感染诊断中的特异性不是很有效。当比较捕获ELISA和检测抗A组碳水化合物IgM抗体的间接ELISA时,间接ELISA中出现了由于类风湿因子导致的假阳性反应,但捕获ELISA中未出现。这些结果表明,捕获ELISA在检测IgM抗体方面比间接ELISA效果更好,并且针对GAS抗原的IgM捕获ELISA仅使用一份血清就能为GAS感染提供快速且高度可靠的血清学诊断。