Suppr超能文献

经皮静脉导管与聚四氟乙烯导管用于新生儿静脉治疗的比较。

Comparison of percutaneous venous catheters and teflon catheters for intravenous therapy in neonates.

作者信息

Reynolds J

出版信息

Neonatal Netw. 1993 Aug;12(5):33-9.

PMID:8350847
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the average duration of catheterization of percutaneous venous catheters (PVCs) with Teflon catheters placed in peripheral veins of neonates, and to describe the incidence of mechanical or infectious complications associated with their use. The sample consisted of twelve subjects with a total of 52 catheters--17 PVCs and 35 Teflon catheters. The results of the study indicated both a significant increase in the duration of catheterization (p = .001) and a significant reduction in the incidence of complications (p = .004) when PVCs were used. The mean duration of catheterization for PVCs was 178.6 hours and for Teflon catheters 41.9 hours. Although 80.8 percent of all the neonates studied suffered some complication leading to early catheter removal, such complications were observed most frequently with Teflon catheters (91 versus 59 percent of PVCs). However, the one subject who experienced the complication of catheter-related sepsis did have a PVC in situ for 313.5 hours. For this sample of neonates, the PVC was the most efficacious mode of IV therapy.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较经皮静脉导管(PVC)与置于新生儿外周静脉的聚四氟乙烯导管的平均置管时间,并描述与使用这些导管相关的机械性或感染性并发症的发生率。样本包括12名受试者,共52根导管——17根PVC导管和35根聚四氟乙烯导管。研究结果表明,使用PVC导管时,置管时间显著延长(p = .001),并发症发生率显著降低(p = .004)。PVC导管的平均置管时间为178.6小时,聚四氟乙烯导管为41.9小时。尽管所有研究的新生儿中有80.8%出现了一些导致导管提前拔除的并发症,但这些并发症在聚四氟乙烯导管中最为常见(91%,而PVC导管为59%)。然而,有一名受试者发生了与导管相关的败血症并发症,其体内的PVC导管实际置管313.5小时。对于该样本的新生儿,PVC是最有效的静脉治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验