Suppr超能文献

需要进行主动脉重建的患者的严重颈动脉疾病。

Advanced carotid disease in patients requiring aortic reconstruction.

作者信息

Bower T C, Merrell S W, Cherry K J, Toomey B J, Hallett J W, Gloviczki P, Naessens J M, Pairolero P C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1993 Aug;166(2):146-51; discussion 151. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81046-3.

Abstract

Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication of abdominal aortic operations. Patients requiring aortic reconstruction with advanced carotid occlusive disease pose a particularly challenging management problem regarding timing of operations. All patients (n = 121) undergoing both carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) and abdominal aortic reconstruction (AAR) within 1 year of each other between 1979 and 1989 were reviewed. The sequence of operation was analyzed to determine its effect on early and late outcome. CEA was the first operation in 99 patients (group I); AAR was performed first in 22 patients (group II). Age, gender, number, types of risk factors, and associated medical problems were similar in both groups. Indications for CEA were: transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), recent ipsilateral stroke, or high-grade asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis exceeding 80%. Indications for aortic operation included: abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortoiliac occlusive disease, and combined aortic and renovascular disease. There were five perioperative strokes, two in group I (2%) and three in group II (14%) (p < 0.04). All strokes occurred after AAR. There were five perioperative deaths (4%), four in group I (4%) and one in group II (5%). Overall survival was significantly greater in group I compared to group II (p < 0.04); 5-year survival was 77% and 51%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, hypertension, and diabetes to adversely affect survival; CEA as the first procedure, however, had a protective effect. Importantly, eight strokes occurred in group I in late follow-up, but only one was ipsilateral to the CEA. We conclude that CEA in selected patients who require AAR is safe, and, when performed prior to abdominal aortic repair, reduces perioperative stroke and may improve long-term survival.

摘要

围手术期卒中是腹主动脉手术的一种严重并发症。对于患有晚期颈动脉闭塞性疾病且需要进行主动脉重建的患者,手术时机的选择是一个特别具有挑战性的管理问题。对1979年至1989年间在1年内先后接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和腹主动脉重建术(AAR)的所有患者(n = 121)进行了回顾性研究。分析手术顺序以确定其对早期和晚期结局的影响。99例患者(I组)先进行CEA;22例患者(II组)先进行AAR。两组患者的年龄、性别、危险因素数量、类型及相关内科问题相似。CEA的适应证为:短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、近期同侧卒中或无症状性颈动脉狭窄超过80%。主动脉手术的适应证包括:腹主动脉瘤、主-髂动脉闭塞性疾病以及主动脉和肾血管联合疾病。围手术期发生5例卒中,I组2例(2%),II组3例(14%)(p < 0.04)。所有卒中均发生在AAR之后。围手术期死亡5例(4%),I组4例(4%),II组1例(5%)。I组的总体生存率显著高于II组(p < 0.04);5年生存率分别为77%和51%。多因素分析表明年龄、高血压和糖尿病对生存率有不利影响;然而,先进行CEA有保护作用。重要的是,I组在随访后期发生8例卒中,但只有1例与CEA同侧。我们得出结论,对于需要进行AAR的特定患者,CEA是安全的,并且在腹主动脉修复之前进行CEA可减少围手术期卒中并可能改善长期生存率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验