Azevedo J, Arroja I, Jacques A, Santos I, Amado P, Marques J C, Araújo V
Laboratório de Ecocardiografia, Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisboa.
Rev Port Cardiol. 1993 Jul-Aug;12(7-8):663-73, 602.
Analysis of the different ambulatory blood pressure monitoring derived parameters in terms of cardiac structural repercussion, in patients with isolated systolic and mild systolic-diastolic hypertension.
Prospective study involving simultaneously the two-dimensional echocardiographic technique and the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring method.
Out patients regularly observed in the Cardiology Department of Egas Moniz Hospital in Lisbon, were included in our study.
We studied 50 hypertensive patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of our study (Group H) and 20 subjects who were the normal aged matched population (Group N). through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in each individual of these two groups, we considered the mean values of daily systolic blood and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product. Through two-dimensional echocardiography we calculated the left ventricular mass and the correspondent index corrected for the body surface.
In the H group an comparing to the N group, the mean value of the daily systolic blood pressure was 112 +/- 6 mmHg and 159 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.001) respectively, diastolic blood pressure was 60 +/- 5 mmHg and 75 +/- 7 mmHg respectively (p < 0.001), heart rate blood pressure product was 6720 +/- 580 and 12561 +/- 678 (p < 0.0001) and of the left ventricular mass index was 109 +/- 10 gm2 and 145 +/- 7 g/m2 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the left ventricular mass index and mean systolic, diastolic blood pressures and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product was 0.60 (p < 0.01), 0.45 (p = NS) and 0.73 (p < 0.001) respectively.
In the evaluation of the increase in left ventricular mass, ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product is a more accurate parameter compared to the mean daily blood pressure values. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a method with a great potential and clinical application, when studying patients with hypertension diagnosis.
分析单纯收缩期和轻度收缩期-舒张期高血压患者动态血压监测得出的不同参数对心脏结构的影响。
前瞻性研究,同时采用二维超声心动图技术和动态血压监测方法。
纳入在里斯本埃加斯·莫尼斯医院心内科定期观察的门诊患者。
我们研究了50名符合研究纳入标准的高血压患者(H组)和20名年龄匹配的正常对照者(N组)。通过动态血压监测,在这两组的每一个个体中,我们考虑每日收缩压、舒张压、心率和动态心率血压乘积的平均值。通过二维超声心动图,我们计算左心室质量及相应的体表面积校正指数。
与N组相比,H组每日收缩压平均值分别为112±6 mmHg和159±8 mmHg(p<0.001),舒张压分别为60±5 mmHg和75±7 mmHg(p<0.001),心率血压乘积分别为6720±580和12561±678(p<0.0001),左心室质量指数分别为109±10 g/m²和145±7 g/m²(p<0.001)。左心室质量指数与平均收缩压、舒张压和动态心率血压乘积的相关系数分别为0.60(p<0.01)、0.45(p=无显著性差异)和0.73(p<0.001)。
在评估左心室质量增加时,动态心率血压乘积是比每日平均血压值更准确的参数。在研究高血压诊断患者时,动态血压监测是一种具有巨大潜力和临床应用价值的方法。