Suppr超能文献

采用三种检测方法对非甲状腺疾病患者以及甲状腺素结合蛋白浓度异常的受试者血清中的游离甲状腺素进行评估。

Free thyroxine assessed with three assays in sera of patients with nonthyroidal illness and of subjects with abnormal concentrations of thyroxine-binding proteins.

作者信息

Docter R, van Toor H, Krenning E P, de Jong M, Hennemann G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III, Academic Hospital Rotterdam, Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1993 Aug;39(8):1668-74.

PMID:8353953
Abstract

Three methods for estimating free thyroxine (FT4) in serum were studied: equilibrium dialysis, the SPAC-ET FT4 radioimmunoassay kit, and the Amerlite MAB FT4 luminometric assay. Serum samples from 10 subjects with above-normal thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), 6 with low TBG, 30 with familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia (FDH), 13 with nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) concentrations in serum > 1.0 mmol/L, and 178 patients with various degrees of nonthyroidal illness (NTI) were measured and compared with samples from 42 euthyroid blood donors. The Amerlite MAB FT4 assay compared well with equilibrium dialysis, whereas the SPAC-ET assay averaged 40% lower. All three assays were not influenced by changes in TBG and showed no or only little changes in the presence of NEFA. Mean FT4 values in the FDH samples were somewhat higher than in controls when measured with the SPAC-ET assay, about equal with equilibrium dialysis, and somewhat below the mean control value with the Amerlite MAB FT4 assay, although individual results were within the control reference range. In NTI patients, no FT4 values were below the control reference range by the Amerlite MAB FT4 assay, 4 of 178 were below this range by equilibrium dialysis, and 1 of 178 was below this range by the SPAC-ET assay. In all assays a large proportion of the NTI samples showed FT4 values above the control reference range, a result that will interfere with the efficacy of these assays for assessing thyroid function in NTI patients.

摘要

研究了三种测定血清游离甲状腺素(FT4)的方法:平衡透析法、SPAC - ET FT4放射免疫分析试剂盒法和Amerlite MAB FT4化学发光免疫分析法。对10例甲状腺素结合球蛋白(TBG)高于正常水平的受试者、6例TBG水平较低的受试者、30例家族性白蛋白异常性高甲状腺素血症(FDH)患者、13例血清中非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)浓度>1.0 mmol/L的患者以及178例患有不同程度非甲状腺疾病(NTI)的患者的血清样本进行了检测,并与42例甲状腺功能正常的献血者的样本进行了比较。Amerlite MAB FT4分析方法与平衡透析法的结果比较吻合,而SPAC - ET分析方法的结果平均低40%。所有这三种分析方法均不受TBG变化的影响,在NEFA存在的情况下无变化或仅有微小变化。用SPAC - ET分析方法测定时,FDH样本中的FT4平均值略高于对照组;用平衡透析法测定时,两者大致相等;用Amerlite MAB FT4分析方法测定时,略低于对照组的平均值,尽管个别结果在对照参考范围内。在NTI患者中,Amerlite MAB FT4分析方法测定的FT4值均未低于对照参考范围,平衡透析法测定的178例中有4例低于此范围,SPAC - ET分析方法测定的178例中有1例低于此范围。在所有分析方法中,很大一部分NTI样本的FT4值高于对照参考范围,这一结果将干扰这些分析方法在评估NTI患者甲状腺功能时的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验