Suppr超能文献

评估一种新型牙线辅助工具的功效。

Evaluating the efficacy of a new flossing aid.

作者信息

Spolsky V W, Perry D A, Meng Z, Kissel P

机构信息

Section of Public Health Dentistry, UCLA School of Dentistry.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Aug;20(7):490-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00396.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of a new flossing aid (Flosser) with finger flossing on preventing plaque and gingival inflammation. 35 adults who did not use dental floss routinely were assigned randomly to one of 2 treatment groups (Flosser or finger flossing) in a 2-period, single-blind crossover study. After prophylaxis, subjects were instructed to use the flossing aid or finger floss 1 x per day and to continue brushing for 30 days. Gingival inflammation (GI & BPI) and plaque (PI) were assessed prior to the prophylaxis and at 30 days. After a 30 day "washout" period, subjects were again reassessed for gingival inflammation and plaque, given a prophylaxis, assigned the opposite treatment (2nd treatment period) that they received the first treatment period, and assessed (GI, BPI & PI) after 30 days. Comparing the mean difference of the 30-day buccal interproximal scores between the treatment groups (flossing aid scores minus finger flossing scores) showed that the mean differences with 95% CI were: -0.013 +/- 0.067 [GI], -0.017 +/- 0.044 [BP] and 0.019 +/- 0.014 [PI]. No statistically significant differences from zero (0.05 alpha) were observed using the t-test. There was a high level of compliance (90%) with the prescribed regiment, and subjects preferred (56%) the flossing aid slightly over finger flossing. Even though there were no statistically or clinically significant differences in gingivitis and plaque scores between the 2 flossing groups, the positive inclination for the flossing aid makes it a desirable addition to the armamentarium of preventive dentistry.

摘要

这项临床试验的目的是比较一种新型牙线辅助工具(牙线器)与手指使用牙线在预防牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的效果。在一项为期两阶段的单盲交叉研究中,35名不经常使用牙线的成年人被随机分配到两个治疗组之一(牙线器组或手指使用牙线组)。在进行牙齿清洁后,受试者被要求每天使用一次牙线辅助工具或手指使用牙线,并继续刷牙30天。在清洁前和30天时评估牙龈炎症(牙龈指数和出血指数)和牙菌斑(菌斑指数)。经过30天的“洗脱”期后,再次对受试者的牙龈炎症和牙菌斑进行重新评估,进行牙齿清洁,分配给他们与第一治疗期相反的治疗方法(第二治疗期),并在30天后进行评估(牙龈指数、出血指数和菌斑指数)。比较治疗组之间30天颊侧邻间隙评分的平均差异(牙线辅助工具评分减去手指使用牙线评分)显示,95%置信区间的平均差异为:-0.013±0.067[牙龈指数],-0.017±0.044[出血指数]和0.019±0.014[菌斑指数]。使用t检验未观察到与零有统计学显著差异(α=0.05)。对规定方案的依从性很高(90%),并且受试者(56%)稍微更喜欢牙线辅助工具而非手指使用牙线。尽管两个牙线组在牙龈炎和牙菌斑评分上没有统计学或临床显著差异,但牙线辅助工具的积极倾向使其成为预防牙科工具库中一个理想的补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验