• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[压迫环境下的人类价值观与人权尊重]

[Human values and respect of human rights in oppressive conditions].

作者信息

Bomba J

机构信息

Katedra Psychiatrii Akademii Medycznej im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Krakowie.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 1993 May-Jun;27(3):225-38.

PMID:8356170
Abstract

Human rights, an issue of political debates in the last decades, listed in the United Nations Declaration of 1946 are rooted in the humanistic tradition of philosophy and religion. The UN declared their universal character and made state organizations responsible for their observation. Among all human rights that for freedom is usually perceived as crucial. Psychiatry developed in Europe primarily a caring function. The medical model developed in psychiatry through the 19th c. supplied the criteria for medical diagnosis of mental disturbance, and elaborated a system of treatment which included long term hospitalization. Medicalization of psychiatry (recently coming back) is a force which gives courage to those who suffer, to their families, and to professionals as well. This power however, can be easily abused, when a psychiatrist adopts a position of someone who knows better that which is good for his/her patient. Legal regulations of the circumstances of psychiatric treatment, especially treatment against the patient's will should prevent the abuse of the mentally disturbed person's right for freedom. The goal is usually achieved by clear description of clinical and other conditions under which a person can be committed, and by establishing the committed person's right to claim the decision to be unjust. Poland is a country without legal regulation in the area of mental health (there are only administrative acts). For more than sixty years several projects on mental health law have been worked on. The last one which came to the Sejm (parliament) in 1980 was withdrawn by the "Solidarity" Trade Union. At present, the membership of Poland in international organizations makes an introduction of mental health law an obligation. Having no legal regulation, Polish psychiatry has been a self-regulating system. It is worth to note that even in the hard Stalinist period (1947-1956) there was no abuse of psychiatry for political reasons. The main reason for Polish psychiatry staying free from political abuse is seen in the role of internalized norm of human dignity. But others should also be taken into account. It was a specificity of the political situation that the ruling powers did not insist that psychiatrists cooperate. On the other hand the integration of the Polish psychiatric community was helpful in observing the rule of non-collaboration. One of the most important factors is seen as the experience and memory of NAZI crimes in the field of psychiatry in Poland. Extermination of psychiatric patients had to leave the feeling of the importance of psychiatrist's own responsibility.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

人权是过去几十年政治辩论的一个议题,1946年联合国宣言中列出的人权植根于哲学和宗教的人文传统。联合国宣布了人权的普遍性,并让国家组织负责监督人权。在所有人权中,自由通常被视为至关重要。精神病学在欧洲主要发展出一种关怀功能。19世纪精神病学中发展起来的医学模式提供了精神障碍医学诊断的标准,并制定了一套包括长期住院治疗的治疗体系。精神病学的医学化(最近又卷土重来)是一种力量,它给患者、他们的家人以及专业人士都带来了勇气。然而,当精神科医生以比患者更清楚什么对其有益的人的立场行事时,这种力量很容易被滥用。对精神病治疗情况的法律规定,尤其是违背患者意愿的治疗,应防止侵犯精神障碍者的自由权利。这一目标通常通过明确描述一个人可以被收治的临床及其他条件,以及确立被收治者对判定不公提出申诉的权利来实现。波兰是一个在心理健康领域没有法律规定的国家(只有行政行为)。六十多年来,已经开展了几个关于心理健康法的项目。1980年提交给议会(众议院)的最后一个项目被“团结”工会撤回。目前,波兰加入国际组织使得引入心理健康法成为一项义务。由于没有法律规定,波兰的精神病学一直是一个自我监管的体系。值得注意的是,即使在艰难的斯大林时期(1947 - 1956年),也没有出于政治原因滥用精神病学的情况。波兰精神病学免受政治滥用的主要原因在于内化的人类尊严规范所起的作用。但其他因素也应予以考虑。这是政治形势的一个特点,即执政权力没有坚持让精神科医生合作。另一方面,波兰精神病学界的团结有助于遵守不合作的规则。最重要的因素之一被认为是波兰精神病学领域纳粹罪行的经历和记忆。对精神病患者的灭绝行为必然让人感受到精神科医生自身责任的重要性。(摘要截取自400字)

相似文献

1
[Human values and respect of human rights in oppressive conditions].[压迫环境下的人类价值观与人权尊重]
Psychiatr Pol. 1993 May-Jun;27(3):225-38.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Was forensic psychiatry in Poland abused for political reasons?].
Psychiatr Pol. 1993 Nov-Dec;27(6):693-701.
4
[The crisis in psychiatry and the protection of the civil rights of mentally ill patients].[精神病学危机与精神病患者公民权利的保护]
Psychiatr Pol. 1994 May-Jun;28(3):301-12.
5
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
6
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
7
[The unbroken power of psychiatry as seen through the eyes of Michel Foucault].[从米歇尔·福柯的视角看精神病学的持续影响力]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2006;48(11):881-7.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
[Current state and perspectives of forensic psychiatry in Poland].[波兰法医精神病学的现状与展望]
Psychiatr Pol. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):577-90.
10
Advances and perspectives in mental health: is psychiatry being stigmatized?心理健康的进展与展望:精神病学正遭受污名化吗?
Psychiatriki. 2011 Oct-Dec;22(4):283-9.