Suppr超能文献

利福霉素SV与曲安奈德在类风湿性滑膜炎局部治疗中的对比

Rifamycin SV versus triamcinolone in local treatment of rheumatoid synovitis.

作者信息

Marchesoni A, Sinigaglia L, Ranza R, Varenna M, Battafarano N, Tosi S

机构信息

Chair of Rheumatology, University of Milan, Istituto Ortopedico G. Pini, Italy.

出版信息

Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22(4):194-8. doi: 10.3109/03009749309099270.

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the usefulness of rifamycin SV as an agent for local treatment of rheumatoid synovitis. Rifamycin SV was compared with triamcinolone acetonide in a randomized controlled trial on 87 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and with persistent knee synovitis. The treatment with rifamycin consisted of several weekly intra-articular injections, whereas triamcinolone was given as a single intra-articular injection. At the end of the therapy, 27 (61.4%) of the 44 rifamycin patients and 39 (91%) of the 43 steroid patients responded well to the treatment, and this difference was significant (p < 0.01). Rifamycin SV was responsible for unpleasant local side effects in all cases. In both groups, after 1 year of follow-up the synovitis had relapsed in about 42% of cases. We conclude that rifamycin SV is less useful than triamcinolone acetonide in the local treatment of rheumatoid synovitis.

摘要

本研究旨在评估利福霉素SV作为类风湿性滑膜炎局部治疗药物的有效性。在一项针对87例类风湿性关节炎伴持续性膝关节滑膜炎患者的随机对照试验中,将利福霉素SV与曲安奈德进行了比较。利福霉素的治疗包括每周进行几次关节内注射,而曲安奈德则作为单次关节内注射给药。治疗结束时,44例接受利福霉素治疗的患者中有27例(61.4%)对治疗反应良好,43例接受类固醇治疗的患者中有39例(91%)反应良好,这种差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。在所有病例中,利福霉素SV均导致了令人不适的局部副作用。在两组中,随访1年后约42%的病例滑膜炎复发。我们得出结论,在类风湿性滑膜炎的局部治疗中,利福霉素SV不如曲安奈德有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验