Trappier S G, Conaty A L, Farrar B B, Auperin D D, McCormick J B, Fisher-Hoch S P
Special Pathogens Branch, National Center of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Aug;49(2):214-21. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.49.214.
We evaluated the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization procedures for diagnosis of Lassa fever. Primers were derived from a region of the small RNA segment of Lassa virus coding for the glycoprotein. Serum samples stored for a 14-year period from patients in Sierra Leone, West Africa were examined retrospectively. Blinded samples were then tested prospectively. Eighty-eight virus isolation-negative control sera were negative by PCR and hybridization. In the retrospective study, virus was isolated from 51 of 98 specimens from patients with Lassa fever, and 33 of these were positive for Lassa virus RNA by PCR, and 42 by PCR and hybridization. Fifteen were positive by PCR and hybridization but isolation-negative, and nine were positive by isolation but PCR/hybridization-negative. Thirty-two were negative by all methods (sensitivity by PCR/hybridization compared with virus isolation 0.82, specificity 0.68). In a prospective blinded study of 195 patient sera, 51 were positive by PCR and virus isolation, and 24 were PCR positive but virus isolation-negative (sensitivity 0.66, specificity 0.71). After hybridization, 66 virus isolation-positive sera were positive. The sensitivity was 0.86 and the specificity was 0.59, and the probability of false-positive results compared with virus isolation was 32%, (chi 2 = 21.9, by McNemar's test). Since some specimens may not have contained viable virus, we re-analyzed the data of individual patients using laboratory-confirmed case definitions for Lassa fever. All specimens from patients in whom Lassa fever was excluded by serologic tests were negative by PCR/hybridization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们评估了聚合酶链反应(PCR)和杂交程序用于拉沙热诊断的效果。引物来源于拉沙病毒编码糖蛋白的小RNA片段区域。对来自西非塞拉利昂患者的储存了14年的血清样本进行了回顾性检测。然后对盲样进行前瞻性检测。88份病毒分离阴性对照血清经PCR和杂交检测均为阴性。在回顾性研究中,从98例拉沙热患者的标本中分离出51份病毒,其中33份经PCR检测拉沙病毒RNA呈阳性,42份经PCR和杂交检测呈阳性。15份经PCR和杂交检测呈阳性但病毒分离阴性,9份经病毒分离呈阳性但PCR/杂交检测阴性。32份经所有方法检测均为阴性(PCR/杂交与病毒分离相比的敏感性为0.82,特异性为0.68)。在对195例患者血清的前瞻性盲法研究中,51份经PCR和病毒分离呈阳性,24份PCR呈阳性但病毒分离阴性(敏感性为0.66,特异性为0.71)。杂交后,66份病毒分离阳性血清呈阳性。敏感性为0.86,特异性为0.59,与病毒分离相比假阳性结果的概率为32%(通过McNemar检验,χ2 = 21.9)。由于一些标本可能不含活病毒,我们使用实验室确诊的拉沙热病例定义对个体患者的数据进行了重新分析。所有经血清学检测排除拉沙热的患者标本经PCR/杂交检测均为阴性。(摘要截短于250字)