Przyklenk K, Kloner R A
Heart Institute, Hospital of the Good Samaritan, Los Angeles, CA.
Basic Res Cardiol. 1993;88 Suppl 1:139-54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-72497-8_10.
Coronary artery occlusion results in the acute activation of the renin-angiotensin system and production of angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor and positive inotropic agent. This has raised the possibility that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors might be "cardioprotective" (that is, might attenuate myocardial injury, dysfunction and necrosis) in the setting of acute ischemia and infarction. Captopril, enalapril and ramipril have, in fact, been reported to acutely limit myocardial injury and necrosis in models of permanent coronary artery occlusion. The mechanisms responsible for this cardioprotection are complex, but include favorable alterations in myocardial oxygen supply/demand, and, in some instances, inhibition of bradykinin metabolism and/or increased prostaglandin synthesis. Other studies, however, have failed to document a reduction in infarct size with ACE inhibitor treatment. Results obtained in models of coronary occlusion/reperfusion have also been mixed. In models of brief transient ischemia not associated with necrosis, captopril and zofenopril have consistently been found to attenuate postischemic contractile dysfunction of the viable but "stunned" myocardium during the early hours following relief of ischemia. In contrast, there is no consensus on the effects of enalapril on the stunned myocardium: both positive and negative results have been obtained. Similar disparity has been reported in models of more prolonged ischemia/reperfusion resulting in subendocardial necrosis: some studies have reported myocardial salvage, while others have provided disturbing evidence of apparent exacerbation of myocardial necrosis with captopril and enalapril therapy. Thus, after a decade of investigative effort, the question of whether ACE inhibitors are "cardioprotective" in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia and infarction remains unresolved. Nonetheless, clinical protocols are in progress to assess the effects of early ACE inhibitor treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
冠状动脉闭塞会导致肾素 - 血管紧张素系统的急性激活以及血管紧张素II的产生,血管紧张素II是一种强效的血管收缩剂和正性肌力药物。这引发了一种可能性,即血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在急性缺血和梗死的情况下可能具有“心脏保护作用”(也就是说,可能减轻心肌损伤、功能障碍和坏死)。事实上,据报道卡托普利、依那普利和雷米普利在永久性冠状动脉闭塞模型中能急性限制心肌损伤和坏死。这种心脏保护作用的机制很复杂,但包括心肌氧供/需的有利改变,并且在某些情况下,抑制缓激肽代谢和/或增加前列腺素合成。然而,其他研究未能证明ACE抑制剂治疗能减小梗死面积。在冠状动脉闭塞/再灌注模型中获得的结果也不一致。在与坏死无关的短暂性缺血模型中,一直发现卡托普利和佐芬普利能减轻缺血缓解后数小时内心肌存活但“顿抑”心肌的缺血后收缩功能障碍。相比之下,关于依那普利对顿抑心肌的影响尚无共识:既有阳性结果也有阴性结果。在导致心内膜下坏死的更长时间缺血/再灌注模型中也报道了类似的差异:一些研究报道了心肌挽救,而另一些研究则提供了令人不安的证据,表明卡托普利和依那普利治疗明显加重了心肌坏死。因此,经过十年的研究努力,ACE抑制剂在急性心肌缺血和梗死情况下是否具有“心脏保护作用”这一问题仍未解决。尽管如此,评估早期ACE抑制剂治疗对急性心肌梗死患者影响的临床方案正在进行中。