Deveney K E, Way L W
Am J Surg. 1977 Jan;133(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90199-4.
Studies were performed in dogs to determine whether the newer absorbable sutures would be preferable to catgut in the gastrointestinal tract. Dissolution times of plain and chromic catgut were compared with those of polyglycolic acid (Dexon) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) sutures exposed to gastrointestinal contents in vitro and in vivo. Strength and healing of gastric, jejunal, and colonic anastomoses performed with each suture were compared in dogs. Catgut sutures proved susceptible to rapid proteolytic digestion throughout the gastrointestinal tract, whereas Dexon and Vicryl were invulnerable. Type of suture did not affect microscopic healing in the stomach jejunum, or colon. However, gastric anastomoses of Dexon were stronger at four and seven days and jejunal anastomoses of Dexon and Vicryl were stronger at seven days than anastomoses of catgut. Dexon and Vicryl may be superior to catgut for use in gastrointestinal anastomoses.
在狗身上进行了研究,以确定新型可吸收缝线在胃肠道中是否比肠线更具优势。将普通肠线和铬制肠线的溶解时间与聚乙醇酸(德克斯隆)缝线和聚乙交酯910(薇乔)缝线在体外和体内暴露于胃肠道内容物时的溶解时间进行了比较。对用每种缝线进行胃、空肠和结肠吻合的强度和愈合情况在狗身上进行了比较。结果表明,肠线缝线在整个胃肠道中易受快速蛋白水解消化的影响,而德克斯隆和薇乔则不受影响。缝线类型不影响胃、空肠或结肠的微观愈合。然而,德克斯隆胃吻合口在第4天和第7天更强,德克斯隆和薇乔空肠吻合口在第7天比肠线吻合口更强。德克斯隆和薇乔在胃肠道吻合术中可能优于肠线。