• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应时间与智力:华裔美国儿童和英裔美国儿童的比较

Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Chinese-American and Anglo-American children.

作者信息

Jensen A R, Whang P A

机构信息

School of Education, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Jul;25(3):397-410. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020721.

DOI:10.1017/s0021932000020721
PMID:8360233
Abstract

Chinese-American and Anglo-American school children were compared on a nonverbal test of intelligence (Raven's Progressive Matrices) and on twelve chronometric variables which measure the speed with which basic information processes (e.g. stimulus apprehension, decision, and discrimination) can be carried out. All of these tasks are correlated with psychometric intelligence. The two groups differed significantly on most of the variables, but the differences appear to be multidimensional and are not simply due to a group difference in psychometric intelligence, equivalent to about 5 IQ points in favour of the Chinese-Americans. The results are compared with those of Lynn and his colleagues on Bristish, Japanese, and Hong Kong children, and both consistencies and inconsistencies are found.

摘要

对华裔美国儿童和英裔美国儿童进行了一项非言语智力测试(瑞文渐进矩阵测验)以及十二项计时变量测试,这些变量衡量的是基本信息处理(如刺激感知、决策和辨别)能够执行的速度。所有这些任务都与心理测量智力相关。两组在大多数变量上存在显著差异,但这些差异似乎是多维度的,并非仅仅是由于心理测量智力上的群体差异,华裔美国儿童在心理测量智力方面比英裔美国儿童高出约5个智商点。将这些结果与林恩及其同事对英国、日本和香港儿童的研究结果进行了比较,发现既有一致性也有不一致性。

相似文献

1
Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Chinese-American and Anglo-American children.反应时间与智力:华裔美国儿童和英裔美国儿童的比较
J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Jul;25(3):397-410. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020721.
2
An exploratory study of social support: a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese-, Japanese-, and Anglo-American breast cancer patients.社会支持的探索性研究:中国、日本和英裔美国乳腺癌患者的跨文化比较
Psychooncology. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):207-19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199905/06)8:3<207::AID-PON357>3.0.CO;2-B.
3
Reaction times and intelligence in Korean children.韩国儿童的反应时间与智力
J Psychol. 1992 Jul;126(4):421-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543375.
4
The relationship between executive functions and IQ in Korean children and the comparison with Chinese children.韩国儿童执行功能与智商之间的关系以及与中国儿童的比较。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):158-165. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2015.1136631. Epub 2016 May 16.
5
Cross-cultural psychiatry: the applicability of Western Anglo Psychiatry to Asian-Americans of Chinese and Japanese ethnicity.跨文化精神病学:西方盎格鲁精神病学对华裔和日裔亚裔美国人的适用性。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1981 Sep;19(9):26-30. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19810901-07.
6
Impact of breast cancer on Asian American and Anglo American women.乳腺癌对亚裔美国女性和英裔美国女性的影响。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;21(4):449-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1005314602587.
7
Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Japanese and British children.反应时间与智力:日本儿童与英国儿童的比较
J Biosoc Sci. 1991 Oct;23(4):409-16. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000019519.
8
Assessment of Intelligence Quotient using Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices among school children of Hyderabad Karnataka region and its correlation with prevalence of dental caries.在海得拉巴-卡纳塔克地区学龄儿童中使用瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验评估智商及其与龋齿患病率的相关性。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):25-30. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_236_18.
9
The difference isn't black and white: stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.差异并非非黑即白:刻板印象威胁与瑞文高级渐进矩阵测验中的种族差距。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):979-85. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.979.
10
Cross-cultural differences in visuo-spatial processing and the culture-fairness of visuo-spatial intelligence tests: an integrative review and a model for matrices tasks.跨文化视空间加工差异及视空间智力测验的文化公平性:综合述评及矩阵任务模型
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00350-w.

引用本文的文献

1
How does cognitive function measured by the reaction time and critical flicker fusion frequency correlate with the academic performance of students?通过反应时间和临界闪烁融合频率测量的认知功能与学生的学业成绩有怎样的关联?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02416-7.
2
Relationship between Divergent Thinking and Intelligence: An Empirical Study of the Threshold Hypothesis with Chinese Children.发散性思维与智力之间的关系:对中国儿童阈值假设的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 22;8:254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00254. eCollection 2017.
3
Meta-analysis of fluid intelligence tests of children from the Chinese mainland with learning difficulties.
大陆地区学习困难儿童流体智力测验的元分析
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078311. eCollection 2013.
4
Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class, and race.大脑大小与认知能力:与年龄、性别、社会阶层和种族的相关性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):21-36. doi: 10.3758/BF03210739.