Galbaud du Fort G, Newman S C, Bland R C
Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Verdun Quebec, Canada.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Aug;181(8):467-74.
Population studies have shown that the co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders increases the likelihood of treatment seeking. This leads to a biased estimation of the prevalence of comorbidity in clinical samples, and this overestimation can be attributed to two different sources of selection bias. Using data from a population survey of psychiatric disorders, in which 3258 residents of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, we assessed the extent of each of these two mechanisms. The first source of selection bias is the mathematical bias known as Berkson's bias and arises from the fact that an individual affected with two psychiatric disorders can seek treatment for either one or the other of these disorders. The second source of selection bias is clinical and results from the changed probability of seeking a treatment for a specific disorder because of the existence of a comorbid disorder.
人群研究表明,精神障碍的共病会增加寻求治疗的可能性。这导致对临床样本中共病患病率的估计存在偏差,而这种高估可归因于两种不同的选择偏倚来源。利用一项精神障碍人群调查的数据,我们对加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市的3258名居民进行了诊断性访谈表访谈,评估了这两种机制各自的影响程度。选择偏倚的第一个来源是被称为伯克森偏倚的数学偏倚,它源于这样一个事实,即患有两种精神障碍的个体可能会为其中一种或另一种障碍寻求治疗。选择偏倚的第二个来源是临床性的,是由于共病障碍的存在导致针对特定障碍寻求治疗的概率发生了变化。