Elnicki D M, Shockcor W T, Morris D K, Halbritter K A
Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Am J Med Sci. 1993 Aug;306(2):94-7. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199308000-00005.
The objective-structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a useful tool in evaluating clinical competence. Traditional clinical-evaluation measures have been criticized as arbitrary and lacking reliability, whereas written exams test primarily cognitive aspects. The OSCE focuses on learner actions rather than abstract knowledge and evaluates in a uniform fashion. A 15-station OSCE was created for an internal medicine junior clerkship, based on predetermined skill and content goals. The exams then were scored by a single, blinded reviewer, again in a predetermined fashion. The OSCE has been studied in terms of reliability, content validity, and construct validity. The exam has become accepted by the department and has guided the continuing curricular development. The OSCE is not designed to measure all the domains of a learner's educational process. However, when used in conjunction with other evaluating mechanisms, it provides an objective outcome measure of the medical education process.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是评估临床能力的一种有用工具。传统的临床评估方法被批评为主观且缺乏可靠性,而笔试主要测试认知方面。OSCE关注学习者的行为而非抽象知识,并以统一的方式进行评估。基于预先确定的技能和内容目标,为内科初级实习创建了一个包含15个站点的OSCE。然后由一名独立的、不知情的评审人员以预先确定的方式对考试进行评分。已对OSCE的信度、内容效度和结构效度进行了研究。该考试已被该部门接受,并指导了课程的持续发展。OSCE并非旨在衡量学习者教育过程的所有领域。然而,当与其他评估机制结合使用时,它为医学教育过程提供了一种客观的结果衡量标准。