• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体弱老年人家庭照顾者的社会支持与照顾负担

Social support and caregiving burden in family caregivers of frail elders.

作者信息

Thompson E H, Futterman A M, Gallagher-Thompson D, Rose J M, Lovett S B

机构信息

Holy Cross College, Worcester, MA.

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1993 Sep;48(5):S245-54. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.5.s245.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/48.5.s245
PMID:8366273
Abstract

This study assessed the relationships between six different types of social support and five measures of caregiving burden. Two questions were addressed: Are all types of social support equally associated with burden, and do the same types of support correlate with different types of burden? Family caregivers (N = 217) to frail elders composed the sample. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that all types of social support for caregivers of frail elders are not equal. Engaging in social interaction for fun and recreation appears to be the most important in diminishing the burden of caregiving. These findings are instructive both theoretically and clinically. The theoretical import of greater social participation under a condition of chronic stress is discussed. Further, interventions that focus on caregivers regularly experiencing pleasant activity with friends and other family would seem to go a long way toward managing the burden of caregiving.

摘要

本研究评估了六种不同类型的社会支持与五种照顾负担衡量指标之间的关系。研究探讨了两个问题:所有类型的社会支持与负担的关联是否相同,以及相同类型的支持与不同类型的负担是否相关?样本由体弱老年人的家庭照顾者(N = 217)组成。多元回归分析表明,体弱老年人照顾者的所有类型社会支持并不相同。参与娱乐性社交互动似乎在减轻照顾负担方面最为重要。这些发现在理论和临床方面都具有指导意义。讨论了在慢性压力条件下更多社会参与的理论意义。此外,关注照顾者定期与朋友和其他家庭成员进行愉快活动的干预措施,似乎在管理照顾负担方面大有帮助。

相似文献

1
Social support and caregiving burden in family caregivers of frail elders.体弱老年人家庭照顾者的社会支持与照顾负担
J Gerontol. 1993 Sep;48(5):S245-54. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.5.s245.
2
Family caregivers' strains: comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving.家庭照顾者的压力:癌症护理与痴呆症、糖尿病及体弱老年人护理的比较分析
J Aging Health. 2008 Aug;20(5):483-503. doi: 10.1177/0898264308317533. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
3
A conceptual framework for understanding the process of family caregiving to frail elders in Taiwan.一个用于理解台湾地区家庭照顾体弱老年人过程的概念框架。
Res Nurs Health. 2002 Apr;25(2):111-21. doi: 10.1002/nur.10027.
4
Depression among caregivers of impaired elders.受损老年人照料者中的抑郁情况。
J Aging Health. 1992 Feb;4(1):58-76. doi: 10.1177/089826439200400104.
5
Caring for frail elders with musculoskeletal conditions and family caregivers' subjective well-being: The role of multidimensional caregiver burden.照顾患有肌肉骨骼疾病的体弱老年人与家庭照顾者的主观幸福感:多维照顾者负担的作用。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;61(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Social support and strain of family caregivers of older adults.老年人家庭照顾者的社会支持与压力
Holist Nurs Pract. 2000 Jan;14(2):77-90. doi: 10.1097/00004650-200001000-00012.
7
Implicit exchanges in family caregiving for frail elders in Taiwan.台湾地区照顾体弱老年人的家庭照料中的隐性交换
Qual Health Res. 2003 Oct;13(8):1078-93. doi: 10.1177/1049732303256370.
8
Daily geographies of caregivers: mobility, routine, scale.照顾者的日常地理分布:流动性、日常活动、规模。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Oct;57(7):1307-25. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00508-7.
9
Economic burden of family caregiving for elderly population in southern Ghana: the case of a peri-urban district.加纳南部老年人口家庭照料的经济负担:以一个城郊地区为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 14;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0511-9.
10
The needs of family caregivers of frail elders during the transition from hospital to home: a Taiwanese sample.体弱老年人从医院转至家中期间家庭照顾者的需求:台湾样本
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep;32(3):619-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01519.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review.衰弱作为烧伤患者不良结局的预测指标:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04302-5.
2
Shared Responsibility and Network Collaboration in Caregiving.护理中的共同责任与网络协作。
Soc Networks. 2023 Jul;74:236-244. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
The Relationship between Social Support and Anxiety Symptoms in Informal Carers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非正式照料者的社会支持与焦虑症状之间的关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):1244. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031244.
4
A moderated-mediation analysis of pathways in the association between Veterans' health and their spouse's relationship satisfaction: The importance of social support.退伍军人健康与其配偶关系满意度之间关联途径的有调节中介分析:社会支持的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 2;13:988814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988814. eCollection 2022.
5
"It made me feel like I wasn't alone in the darkness": exploring dementia care network communication and coordination through a digital health platform.“这让我感到在黑暗中并不孤单”:通过数字健康平台探索痴呆症护理网络的沟通和协调。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2003-2013. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac172.
6
Primary and Secondary Caregivers of People with Dementia (PwD): Differential Patterns and Implications for Psychological Support.痴呆症患者的主要和次要照料者:不同模式及对心理支持的启示
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;10(6):1102. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061102.
7
Impact of Social Support and Social Trust on Public Viral Risk Response: A COVID-19 Survey Study.社会支持和社会信任对公众病毒风险反应的影响:一项 COVID-19 调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186589.
8
Determinants of overburdening among informal carers: a systematic review.非正规照护者负担过重的决定因素:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01708-3.
9
TALKING TIME: A pilot randomized controlled trial investigating social support for informal caregivers via the telephone.交流时间:一项通过电话为非正式照护者提供社会支持的试点随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05523-9.
10
Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: A meta-analysis.成人及老年人照料者的社会支持与主观负担:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189874. eCollection 2018.