• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons.

作者信息

Favell J E, Cannon P R

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Jan;81(4):357-61.

PMID:836635
Abstract

Research with retarded and nonretarded populations suggest that toys can be an important part of group-care programs. Yet in a review of the literature. Wheman (1976) showed that there was a paucity of empirical data on effective toy utilization with retarded populations. In this study time-sampling measurements were made of the free-play behavior of 11 severely retarded females with 20 different toys and comparison items. Data analysis revealed that (a) the subjects had strong preferences among toys; (b) there was a low, statistically nonsignificant, correlation between toy preference and price; and (c) professional staff were unable to make accurate predictions of toy preference. Subjects were idle 65 percent of the time when only the 10 less popular toys were available, but only 25% of the time when only the 10 more popular toys were available. We concluded that (a) the behavior of retarded individuals is strongly influenced by the particular toys available to them, (b) empirical data are necessary to make maximally effective and economical use of entertainment materials, and (c) the current lack of such data for retarded population makes this an important area for future research.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons.
Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Jan;81(4):357-61.
2
Effects of ordinary and adaptive toys on pre-school children with developmental disabilities.普通玩具和适应性玩具对发育障碍学龄前儿童的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
3
Cognitive play of mentally retarded preschoolers: observations in the home and school.智力发育迟缓学龄前儿童的认知游戏:在家中和学校的观察
Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Mar;94(5):475-87.
4
Mother-child interactions with nonretarded and mentally retarded preschoolers.与发育正常和智力发育迟缓的学龄前儿童的母婴互动。
Am J Ment Defic. 1982 Jul;87(1):20-5.
5
Looking patterns of mentally retarded and nonretarded infants in play and instructional interactions.观察智障和非智障婴儿在玩耍及教学互动中的行为模式。
Am J Ment Defic. 1987 Mar;91(5):516-23.
6
Playing with fire: images of fire on toy packaging.玩火:玩具包装上的火焰图案
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 May-Jun;24(3):163-5; discussion 158. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000066787.49058.1A.
7
Associations among gender-linked toy preferences, spatial ability, and digit ratio: evidence from eye-tracking analysis.性别关联的玩具偏好、空间能力与指长比之间的关联:来自眼动追踪分析的证据
Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Dec;35(6):699-709. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9038-2.
8
Evaluation of auditory sensory memory of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.智障者与非智障者听觉感觉记忆的评估。
Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Jul;86(1):50-9.
9
Suppressive effects of visual and facial screening on self-injurious finger-sucking.
Am J Ment Defic. 1986 Mar;90(5):526-34.
10
Naturalistic studies of institutionalized profoundly or severely mentally retarded persons: the relationship of density and behavior.
Am J Ment Defic. 1983 Jan;87(4):441-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.对通过以个人为中心的规划为重度多重残疾人士确定的偏好进行的系统评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):467-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-467.
2
Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.验证重度残疾个体的预测活动偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):239-45. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-239.
3
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
4
Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.对严重残疾个体偏好的计算机化评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Winter;19(4):445-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445.
5
Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.评估重度智力障碍者的食物偏好:提供做出选择的机会。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):183-95. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-183.