• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[VEPA方案与ACO-MEP-BD方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的对比研究]

[A comparative study of VEPA and ACOMEP-BD regimen for the patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].

作者信息

Kanamori H, Tanabe J, Okamoto R, Tamura T, Fujita H, Murata T, Hashimoto Y, Harano H, Matsuzaki M, Motomura S

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Rinsho Ketsueki. 1993 Jun;34(6):697-704.

PMID:8366571
Abstract

Between 1981 and 1990, ACOMEP-BD regimen (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, prednisolone, bleomycin, dacarbazine) was compared with VEPA regimen (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, adriamycin) in 66 newly diagnosed patients younger than 65 of age, with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The median age of the patients was 47.5 years (range 22-64 years), 43 males and 23 females. One patients were in stage I, 6 were in II, 27 were in III, 32 were in IV. Twenty-seven patients received VEPA and 39 received ACOMEP-BD. The therapeutic results of 66 patients with ACOMEP-BD or VEPA were as follows: complete remission (CR) rate of 54% and 48%; relapse rate of 29% and 77%; CR duration of 2-34 months (mean: 22 months) and 2-74 months (16 months); freedom-from-relapse survival (at 3 years) of 71% and 38%; and overall survival (at 4 years) of 62% and 26%, respectively. In these results, only relapse rate was significant and the others were not. Prognostic factors were performance status (PS) and lactate dehydrogenase level for ACOMEP-BD, and PS and marrow involvement for VEPA. Received dose intensity was 0.85 in ACOMP-BD and 0.41 in VEPA. It was expected that outcome of patients with NHL can be improved by increasing dose intensity.

摘要

1981年至1990年间,对66例新诊断的年龄小于65岁的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者,比较了ACOMP - BD方案(阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、甲氨蝶呤、依托泊苷、泼尼松龙、博来霉素、达卡巴嗪)与VEPA方案(长春新碱、环磷酰胺、泼尼松龙、阿霉素)。患者的中位年龄为47.5岁(范围22 - 64岁),男性43例,女性23例。1例患者处于I期,6例处于II期,27例处于III期,32例处于IV期。27例患者接受VEPA方案,39例接受ACOMP - BD方案。66例接受ACOMP - BD或VEPA方案治疗的患者的治疗结果如下:完全缓解(CR)率分别为54%和48%;复发率分别为29%和77%;CR持续时间分别为2 - 34个月(平均:22个月)和2 - 74个月(16个月);无复发生存率(3年时)分别为71%和38%;总生存率(4年时)分别为62%和26%。在这些结果中,只有复发率有显著差异,其他无显著差异。ACOMP - BD方案的预后因素是体能状态(PS)和乳酸脱氢酶水平,VEPA方案的预后因素是PS和骨髓受累情况。ACOMP - BD方案的接受剂量强度为0.85,VEPA方案为0.41。预期通过增加剂量强度可改善NHL患者的预后。

相似文献

1
[A comparative study of VEPA and ACOMEP-BD regimen for the patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].[VEPA方案与ACO-MEP-BD方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的对比研究]
Rinsho Ketsueki. 1993 Jun;34(6):697-704.
2
[Combination chemotherapy with adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone (VEPA) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with special reference to correlation of surface phenotype with response and survival].[阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松龙联合化疗(VEPA)治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤,特别提及表面表型与反应及生存的相关性]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1988 Jul;15(7):2057-63.
3
[Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisolone (VEPA) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Jan;13(1):65-9.
4
Major prognostic factors of adult patients with advanced B-cell lymphoma treated with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and doxorubicin (VEPA) or VEPA plus methotrexate (VEPA-M).
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):113-24.
5
[Low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: intensive combined chemotherapy].
Rinsho Ketsueki. 1996 Feb;37(2):101-8.
6
[Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].采用ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):345-8.
7
Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the CNS treated with CHOD/BVAM or BVAM chemotherapy before radiotherapy: long-term survival and prognostic factors.放疗前采用CHOD/BVAM或BVAM化疗方案治疗的中枢神经系统原发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:长期生存及预后因素
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.001.
8
[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].[化疗CHOP方案与CHOP/VIA方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:132例患者的随机多中心研究。PETHEMA组。恶性血液病研究与治疗项目。西班牙血液学与血液治疗协会]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 May 9;110(16):601-4.
9
14-day variant of the bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone regimen in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a pilot study of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group.博来霉素、依托泊苷、阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴肼和泼尼松方案用于晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的14天变体:德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组的一项试点研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 1;21(9):1734-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.028.
10
A variant of ProMACE-CytaBOM chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with threefold higher drug dose size but identical cumulative dose intensity. A pilot study of the Italian lymphoma study group (GISL).一种用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤的ProMACE-CytaBOM化疗方案变体,药物剂量大小提高了三倍,但累积剂量强度相同。意大利淋巴瘤研究组(GISL)的一项试点研究。
Haematologica. 2000 Mar;85(3):263-8.