Suppr超能文献

门诊患者术后疼痛管理中地佐辛、吗啡和纳布啡的静脉连续给药剂量

Serial intravenous doses of dezocine, morphine, and nalbuphine in the management of postoperative pain for outpatients.

作者信息

Cohen R I, Edwards W T, Kezer E A, Ferrari D A, Liland A E, Smith E R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Leominster Hospital, MA 01453.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1993 Sep;77(3):533-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199309000-00018.

Abstract

Adult patients who had arthroscopic surgery under general anesthesia and requested postoperative pain relief were randomized to receive treatment in a double-blind protocol with 5 mg of intravenous dezocine (20 patients), morphine (22 patients), nalbuphine (18 patients), or saline (24 patients). At 10-min intervals, starting with the first dose of analgesic, patients could choose up to three additional doses of the primary treatment, or choose an alternative analgesic if the primary drug was unsatisfactory. One to four doses of morphine were given as the alternate treatment if the initial treatment was dezocine or nalbuphine, and one to four doses of dezocine were given if the initial treatment was saline or morphine. The proportion of patients treated successfully by the initial treatments (i.e., not requesting alternate treatment), with P value for difference from placebo treatment, were saline 25%, nalbuphine 33% (P = 0.048), morphine 54% (P = 0.04), and dezocine 75% (P = 0.003). Dezocine and morphine are more efficacious than nalbuphine in the management of early postoperative pain. As an alternate analgesic in this study, dezocine required fewer doses to achieve patient satisfaction and was thus more efficacious than morphine. The incidence of treatment-related, adverse effects was different from that of saline or other treatments only for nalbuphine-related pain or burning on injection and dezocine-related facial itching. With respect to analgesic actions and side effects, dezocine seems more like morphine than nalbuphine.

摘要

接受全身麻醉下关节镜手术并要求术后镇痛的成年患者,按照双盲方案随机分组,分别接受5毫克静脉注射地佐辛(20例患者)、吗啡(22例患者)、纳布啡(18例患者)或生理盐水(24例患者)治疗。从第一剂镇痛药开始,每隔10分钟,患者可以选择最多三剂额外的主要治疗药物,或者如果主要药物效果不佳则选择替代镇痛药。如果初始治疗是地佐辛或纳布啡,则给予1至4剂吗啡作为替代治疗;如果初始治疗是生理盐水或吗啡,则给予1至4剂地佐辛。初始治疗成功治疗的患者比例(即未要求替代治疗)以及与安慰剂治疗差异的P值分别为:生理盐水组25%,纳布啡组33%(P = 0.048),吗啡组54%(P = 0.04),地佐辛组75%(P = 0.003)。在术后早期疼痛管理中,地佐辛和吗啡比纳布啡更有效。作为本研究中的替代镇痛药,地佐辛达到患者满意所需的剂量更少,因此比吗啡更有效。仅在与纳布啡相关的疼痛或注射时烧灼感以及与地佐辛相关的面部瘙痒方面,与治疗相关的不良反应发生率与生理盐水或其他治疗不同。就镇痛作用和副作用而言,地佐辛似乎比纳布啡更像吗啡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验