• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告中区分抑郁与焦虑：来自非临床和临床样本验证性因素分析的证据。

Distinguishing depression and anxiety in self-report: evidence from confirmatory factor analysis on nonclinical and clinical samples.

作者信息

Feldman L A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Aug;61(4):631-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.631.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.631
PMID:8370858
Abstract

Psychologists believe that anxiety and depression self-report scales tap distinct constructs. This assumption was tested by using confirmatory factor analysis on mood data from nonclinical samples (K. S. Dobson, 1985a; I. H. Gotlib, 1984; J. Tanaka-Matsumi & V.A. Kameoka, 1986) and a clinical sample (J. Mendels, N. Weinstein, & C. Cochrane, 1972). These analyses provide evidence that anxiety and depression self-report scales do not measure discriminant mood constructs and may therefore be better thought of as measures of general negative mood rather than as measures of anxiety and depression per se.

摘要

心理学家认为，焦虑和抑郁自评量表测量的是不同的结构。通过对非临床样本（K.S.多布森，1985年a；I.H.戈特利布，1984年；J.田中松美和V.A.龟冈，1986年）和临床样本（J.门德尔斯、N.温斯坦和C. Cochrane，1972年）的情绪数据进行验证性因素分析，对这一假设进行了检验。这些分析提供了证据，表明焦虑和抑郁自评量表并不能测量有区别的情绪结构，因此，或许最好将其视为一般消极情绪的测量指标，而不是焦虑和抑郁本身的测量指标。

相似文献

1
Distinguishing depression and anxiety in self-report: evidence from confirmatory factor analysis on nonclinical and clinical samples.自我报告中区分抑郁与焦虑：来自非临床和临床样本验证性因素分析的证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Aug;61(4):631-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.631.
2
Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).认知与躯体焦虑状态-特质量表（STICSA）的心理测量学特性：与状态-特质焦虑量表（STAI）的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):369-81. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369.
3
Self-reports of depression and state-trait anxiety: evidence for differential assessment.抑郁与状态-特质焦虑的自我报告：差异评估的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Nov;63(5):832-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.5.832.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories in patients with major depression.重度抑郁症患者中贝克焦虑和抑郁量表的验证性因素分析
J Affect Disord. 1998 Jan;47(1-3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00103-1.
5
Problems with the differentiation of anxiety and depression.焦虑与抑郁的区分问题。
J Psychiatr Res. 1989;23(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(89)90013-7.
6
Complicated grief, depression, and anxiety as distinct postloss syndromes: a confirmatory factor analysis study.复杂悲伤、抑郁和焦虑作为不同的丧亲后综合征：一项验证性因素分析研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;162(11):2175-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2175.
7
Discriminant validity of the SCL-90 dimensions of anxiety and depression.症状自评量表90项中焦虑和抑郁维度的区分效度。
Assessment. 1998 Jun;5(2):197-201. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500210.
8
Taking the measure of anxiety and depression. Validity of the reconstructed Hamilton scales.测量焦虑与抑郁。重构版汉密尔顿量表的效度。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Aug;175(8):474-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198708000-00005.
9
Confirmatory factor analyses of the Anxiety and Depression content scales of the MMPI-2.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版（MMPI - 2）焦虑和抑郁分量表的验证性因素分析。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Jun;68(3):678-91. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_13.
10
Distinguishing anxiety and depression in self-report: purification of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory-II.在自我报告中区分焦虑和抑郁：贝克焦虑量表和贝克抑郁量表-II 的纯化。
J Clin Psychol. 2010 Sep;66(9):927-40. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20701.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive utility of symptom measures in classifying anxiety and depression: A machine-learning approach.症状测量在焦虑和抑郁分类中的预测效用：一种机器学习方法。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jun;312:114534. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114534. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
2
Towards an affect intensity regulation hypothesis: Systematic review and meta-analyses of the relationship between affective states and alcohol consumption.迈向情感强度调节假说：情感状态与酒精消费关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):e0262670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262670. eCollection 2022.
3
Development of a Screening Tool for Common Mental Disorders Among General Hospital Inpatients in China.
中国综合医院住院患者常见精神障碍筛查工具的开发
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 23;12:770255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770255. eCollection 2021.
4
Emotional adaptation during a crisis: decline in anxiety and depression after the initial weeks of COVID-19 in the United States.危机中的情绪适应：美国 COVID-19 最初几周后焦虑和抑郁的下降。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 20;11(1):435. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01552-y.
5
Specificity of trait anxiety in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.特质焦虑在焦虑和抑郁中的特异性：状态-特质焦虑问卷的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101928. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101928. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
6
Attentional Control in Subclinical Anxiety and Depression: Depression Symptoms Are Associated With Deficits in Target Facilitation, Not Distractor Inhibition.亚临床焦虑和抑郁中的注意力控制：抑郁症状与目标促进缺陷有关，而非与分心物抑制缺陷有关。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01660. eCollection 2020.
7
Inspecting Vulnerability to Depression From Social Media Affect.从社交媒体影响审视抑郁症易感性。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 21;11:54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00054. eCollection 2020.
8
Norms for Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale.Zung 自评焦虑量表的常模。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2427-6.
9
Clinical Utility of Beck Anxiety Inventory in Clinical and Nonclinical Korean Samples.贝克焦虑量表在韩国临床和非临床样本中的临床效用。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 4;9:666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00666. eCollection 2018.
10
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a Psychiatric Outpatient Population.贝克焦虑量表和贝克抑郁量表-II 在精神科门诊人群中的探索性因素分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Apr 16;33(16):e128. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e128.