Kress E, Schulz H G, Neumann T
Klinik für Radiologie, Universität Leipzig.
HNO. 1993 Jul;41(7):345-51.
In the present study 162 patients with clinically suspected diseases of the major salivary glands were examined via sonography (n = 162), sialography (n = 111) and CT-sialography (n = 49). The reliability of the three radiological procedures was assessed in diagnosing sialoadenitis, sialolithiasis and glandular and extraglandular tumors. Forty-seven patients were examined with all three methods, 64 patients with sonography and sialography, 2 patients with sonography and CT-sialography and 49 patients with only sonography. The results were compared retrospectively with histologically (70%), cytologically (26%) and clinically proven diagnoses. A sialoadenitis was diagnosed via sonography at a sensitivity of 58%. Sialography frequently produced a false diagnosis of "glandular tumor", which resulted in a comparatively lower sensitivity of 54%. This finding contrasted with the experiences of other authors. A glandular tumor was correctly diagnosed by all three methods and had approximately the same sensitivity (sonography 89%, sialograph 91% and CT-sialography 92%). The correct diagnosis of salivary gland tumors was found by sonography and CT-sialography in 76% of cases and by sialography in 83% of cases. CT-sialography was clearly the superior diagnostic method for detecting extraglandular tumors. Sonography proved its worth as the fundamental procedure for special diagnostic testings of the salivary glands. Sialography is necessary for obtaining important additional information, especially in cases with suspect glandular tumors. CT-sialography is indispensable in the diagnosis of tumors, especially if a malignant, extraglandular or medially localized process is suspected.
在本研究中,对162例临床怀疑患有大唾液腺疾病的患者进行了超声检查(n = 162)、涎管造影(n = 111)和CT涎管造影(n = 49)。评估了这三种放射学检查方法在诊断涎腺炎、涎石病以及腺内和腺外肿瘤方面的可靠性。47例患者接受了所有三种检查方法,64例患者接受了超声和涎管造影检查,2例患者接受了超声和CT涎管造影检查,49例患者仅接受了超声检查。将结果与经组织学(70%)、细胞学(26%)和临床证实的诊断进行回顾性比较。通过超声诊断涎腺炎的敏感性为58%。涎管造影经常对“腺肿瘤”做出错误诊断,导致相对较低的敏感性,为54%。这一发现与其他作者的经验不同。三种方法均能正确诊断腺肿瘤,且敏感性大致相同(超声89%、涎管造影91%、CT涎管造影92%)。超声和CT涎管造影对涎腺肿瘤的正确诊断率为76%,涎管造影为83%。CT涎管造影显然是检测腺外肿瘤的 superior诊断方法。超声证明了其作为涎腺特殊诊断检查基本方法的价值。涎管造影对于获取重要的额外信息是必要的,特别是在怀疑腺肿瘤的病例中。CT涎管造影在肿瘤诊断中是不可或缺的,尤其是在怀疑有恶性、腺外或内侧定位病变的情况下。