堕胎与基因操控：摒弃基于不尊重生命和人类尊严的推理。
Abortion and genetic manipulation: breaking with reasoning founded on disrespect for life and human dignity.
作者信息
Dijon X
机构信息
Faculté de Droit, Université de Notre-Dame da la Paix, Namur, Belgium.
出版信息
Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):85-92.
PMID:8377625
Abstract
Scientists often base their claim to the right to carry out experiments with embryos on the freedom of women to have abortions. In this article the attempts made by two French jurists to counter this claim are studied. In my view, their juridical line of reasoning needs to be extended from the ban on genetic manipulation to a ban on abortion.
摘要
科学家们常常将他们进行胚胎实验的权利主张建立在女性堕胎自由的基础之上。本文研究了两位法国法学家为反驳这一主张所做的努力。在我看来，他们的司法推理思路需要从禁止基因操作扩展到禁止堕胎。
相似文献
1
Abortion and genetic manipulation: breaking with reasoning founded on disrespect for life and human dignity.
Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):85-92.
2
How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):33-42.
3
Abortion ethics.
Nurs Outlook. 1982 Apr;30(4):234-40.
4
Bodies, rights and abortion.
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):176-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.176.
5
Human life symposium: a synopsis and critique.
Law Med Health Care. 1982 Jun;10(3):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1982.tb00306.x.
6
The legal status of the embryo in comparative perspective.
Med Law. 1992;11(7-8):579-90.
7
Abortion and international law: the status and possible extension of women's right to privacy.
J Fam Law. 1981;20(2):241-61.
8
The concept of wrongful life in the law.
Women Health. 1983 Spring;8(1):81-7. doi: 10.1300/J013v08n01_10.
9
The Polkinghorne Report on Fetal Research: nice recommendations, shame about the reasoning.
J Med Ethics. 1993 Jun;19(2):114-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.2.114.
10
The right to be born.
Med Law. 1989;7(5):475-82.
Zotero 插件