• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bodies, rights and abortion.身体、权利与堕胎。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):176-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.176.
2
Abortion and genetic manipulation: breaking with reasoning founded on disrespect for life and human dignity.堕胎与基因操控:摒弃基于不尊重生命和人类尊严的推理。
Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):85-92.
3
Freedom of conscience, professional responsibility, and access to abortion.良心自由、职业责任与堕胎权利
J Law Med Ethics. 1994 Fall;22(3):280-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1994.tb01308.x.
4
Abortion ethics.堕胎伦理
Nurs Outlook. 1982 Apr;30(4):234-40.
5
"Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.“别用你的法律干涉我的身体”:堕胎管制与征收条款
New Engl Law Rev. 1995 Winter;29(2):253-84.
6
Human life symposium: a synopsis and critique.人类生命研讨会:概述与评论
Law Med Health Care. 1982 Jun;10(3):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1982.tb00306.x.
7
Self-ownership, abortion and infanticide.自我所有权、堕胎与杀婴
J Med Ethics. 1979 Sep;5(3):133-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.5.3.133.
8
Beyond the legal right: why liberals and feminists don't like to talk about the morality of abortion.
Wash Mon. 1989 Apr;21(3):28-44.
9
Consequences for patients of health care professionals' conscientious actions: the ban on abortions in South Australia.医疗保健专业人员出于良心的行为给患者带来的后果:南澳大利亚州的堕胎禁令。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Jun;20(2):80-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.2.80.
10
Fetal tissue transplantation: can it be morally insulated from abortion?胎儿组织移植:它在道德上能与堕胎分隔开吗?
J Med Ethics. 1991 Jun;17(2):70-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.2.70.

引用本文的文献

1
Persons and their bodies: how we should think about human embryos.
Health Care Anal. 2002;10(2):155-64. doi: 10.1023/A:1016592718141.
2
Babies, child bearers and commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the political economy of commercial surrogate motherhood.
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(1):1-18. doi: 10.1023/A:1009494710517.

身体、权利与堕胎。

Bodies, rights and abortion.

作者信息

McLachlan H V

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):176-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.176.

DOI:10.1136/jme.23.3.176
PMID:9220332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377347/
Abstract

The issue of abortion is discussed with reference to the claim that people have a right of control over their own bodies. Do people "own" their own bodies? If so, what would be entailed? These questions are discussed in commonsense terms and also in relation to the jurisprudence of Hohfeld, Honore, Munzer and Waldron. It is argued that whether or not women are morally and/or should be legally entitled to have abortions, such entitlements cannot be derived from a general moral entitlement to do what we will with our own bodies since there is no such entitlement. Whether or not we "own" them, we can have rights duties, liabilities, restrictions and disadvantages as well as rights concerning our own bodies.

摘要

关于堕胎问题的讨论,涉及到人们对自己身体拥有控制权这一主张。人们真的“拥有”自己的身体吗?如果是,这意味着什么?这些问题将从常识角度以及与霍菲尔德、霍诺雷、芒泽和沃尔德伦的法理学相关的角度进行讨论。有人认为,无论女性在道德上是否有权利以及/或者在法律上是否应该有权堕胎,这种权利都不能从对自己身体随心所欲行事的一般道德权利中推导出来,因为不存在这样的权利。无论我们是否“拥有”自己的身体,我们对自己的身体既可以有权利,也可以有义务、责任、限制和不利之处。