• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature.

作者信息

Cheng M, Hannah M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):605-18.

PMID:8377990
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether planned vaginal or elective cesarean delivery is better for singleton term breech infants.

DATA SOURCES

Articles that included singleton term pregnancies with breech presentation published in English between 1966 and September 1992 were searched through the Index Medicus, Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, and MEDLINE.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We reviewed 24 studies that presented results according to the intended mode of delivery in terms of the following adverse outcomes: perinatal mortality, low 5-minute Apgar score, traumatic neonatal morbidity, overall short-term neonatal morbidity, long-term infant morbidity, and maternal morbidity and mortality.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The effect of planned vaginal delivery, compared with planned cesarean delivery, for each adverse outcome was determined by calculating a typical odds ratio. Perinatal mortality was higher for the planned vaginal delivery groups than for the elective cesarean groups, with a typical odds ratio of 3.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.22-6.69). Neonatal morbidity due to trauma was also higher for the planned vaginal delivery groups, with a typical odds ratio of 3.96 (95% CI 2.76-5.67).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that planned vaginal delivery may be associated with higher perinatal mortality and morbidity rates than planned cesarean delivery. Because of selection bias in the majority of studies, differences in outcomes may be due to factors other than the planned method of delivery. An appropriately sized, randomized controlled trial is needed to answer this question definitively.

摘要

相似文献

1
Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature.
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):605-18.
2
Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants.1995年至1999年荷兰的臀位分娩:33824例婴儿的死亡率和发病率与分娩方式的关系
BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):604-9.
3
Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium.足月臀位计划经阴道分娩仍是一种选择吗?法国和比利时的一项前瞻性观察性调查结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):1002-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817.
4
A meta-analysis of infant outcomes after breech delivery.
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):1047-54. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00053-T.
5
Outcome of term breech by intended mode of delivery.足月臀位按预期分娩方式的结局。
Niger J Med. 2004 Apr-Jun;13(2):106-9.
6
[More moderate neonatal morbidity in the case of non-randomized vaginal delivery of term breech pregnancies].足月臀位妊娠非随机阴道分娩情况下新生儿发病率较高
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Aug 11;145(32):1558-61.
7
Moderate neonatal morbidity after vaginal term breech delivery.足月臀位阴道分娩后的中度新生儿发病率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Dec;16(6):357-61. doi: 10.1080/14767050400018163.
8
Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.臀位胎儿经阴道分娩与剖宫产的比较。
J Perinat Med. 1999;27(5):339-51. doi: 10.1515/JPM.1999.047.
9
Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.选择性重复剖宫产与试产:1989年至1999年文献的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;183(5):1187-97. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108890.
10
Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term.足月选择性阴道臀位分娩的良好围产期结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jun;84(6):578-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00248.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Term breech presentation-Intended cesarean section versus intended vaginal delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.臀先露分娩方式-计划剖宫产与计划阴道分娩-系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jun;101(6):564-576. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14333.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of vaginal breech delivery for singleton term pregnancies in a carefully selected Cameroonian population: a cohort study.喀麦隆一个经过精心挑选的人群中,单胎足月妊娠经阴道臀位分娩的母婴结局:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e017198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017198.
3
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.
足月臀位分娩计划剖宫产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;2015(7):CD000166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2.
4
Extrinsic factors influencing fetal deformations and intrauterine growth restriction.影响胎儿畸形和宫内生长受限的外部因素。
J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:750485. doi: 10.1155/2012/750485. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
5
Correcting non cephalic presentation with moxibustion: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in general practice.艾灸纠正非头位胎位:一项全科医学多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008 May 21;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-22.
6
Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up.足月臀位胎儿分娩方式的长期结局:基于人群的随访研究
BMJ. 1996 Jun 8;312(7044):1451-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1451.
7
Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term.足月臀位的剖宫产或阴道分娩
BMJ. 1996 Jun 8;312(7044):1433-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1433.
8
External cephalic version. Does it have a role in modern obstetric practice?外倒转术。它在现代产科实践中有作用吗?
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Apr;42:693-8.