Flagler E, Baylis F, Rodgers S
Office of Medical Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alta.
CMAJ. 1997 Jun 15;156(12):1729-32.
When a pregnant woman makes a decision or acts in a manner that may be detrimental to the health and well-being of her fetus, her physician may be faced with an ethical dilemma. Is the physician's primary duty to respect the woman's autonomy, or to promote behaviour that may be in the best interest of the fetus? The controversial concept of "fetal rights" or the "fetus as a patient" contributes to the notion that the pregnant woman and her fetus are potential adversaries. However, Canadian law has upheld women's right to life, liberty and security of the person and has not recognized fetal rights. If a woman is competent and refuses medical advice, her decision must be respected even if the physician believes that her fetus will suffer as a result. Coercion of the woman is not permissible no matter what appears to be in the best interest of the fetus.
当一名孕妇做出可能对其胎儿的健康和福祉有害的决定或行为时,她的医生可能会面临伦理困境。医生的首要职责是尊重孕妇的自主权,还是促进可能符合胎儿最大利益的行为?“胎儿权利”或“将胎儿视为患者”这一有争议的概念助长了这样一种观念,即孕妇与其胎儿是潜在的对手。然而,加拿大法律维护了妇女的生命权、自由权和人身安全权,并未承认胎儿权利。如果一名妇女有行为能力且拒绝医疗建议,即使医生认为她的胎儿会因此受苦,她的决定也必须得到尊重。无论什么似乎符合胎儿的最大利益,都不允许对该妇女进行 coercion。 (注:原文中coercion未翻译,可能是笔误,此处可补充为“强制”之类的合适表述)