Walach N, Gur Y
Department of Oncology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Oncology. 1993 Jul-Aug;50(4):279-84. doi: 10.1159/000227196.
Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) scores in peripheral blood and plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were determined in 58 lung cancer patients and compared with those of 22 healthy persons, who served as controls. In the control group we found LAP scores of 54 +/- 28 and CEA levels of 4 +/- 3 ng/ml. The 97.7% confidence intervals are: LAP score < 110 and CEA level < 10. In the patients with limited lung cancer we found LAP scores of 152.4 +/- 36.7 and CEA levels of 22.7 +/- 48 ng/ml. The 97.7% confidence intervals are: LAP score > 78.6 and CEA level > 0. In the patients with extensive lung cancer we found LAP scores of 272 +/- 49 and CEA levels of 47.5 +/- 80.4 ng/ml. The 97.7% confidence intervals are: LAP score > 174 and CEA level > 0. The sensitivity of each marker is discussed, here as percent of false-negative results, denoted PFN, and meaning that with a chosen threshold for the marker level, only PFN% of the patients with a given condition (e.g. extensive lung cancer) might have a marker level less than the chosen threshold and could therefore be assumed healthy. The sensitivity of the LAP score is 0.05% PFN for the group of patients with extensive lung cancer, and we conclude that indeed LAP score < 110 indicates a very low probability of having extensive malignancy. The sensitivity of the CEA level is 32% PFN. The sensitivity of the LAP score to limited lung cancer is 12% PFN for the group of patients with that condition compared with 40% of CEA. The specificities of both LAP score and CEA levels, expressed as percent of false-positive results in the control group, are fair (2.3%), provided that the common conditions, other than cancer, that elevate LAP score and/or CEA levels are well known and can be eliminated by the physician. It is concluded that the LAP score is considerably more useful than the CEA level as a marker for extensive lung cancer.
对58例肺癌患者测定了外周血白细胞碱性磷酸酶(LAP)评分和血浆癌胚抗原(CEA)水平,并与22名健康人(作为对照)进行比较。在对照组中,我们发现LAP评分为54±28,CEA水平为4±3 ng/ml。97.7%的置信区间为:LAP评分<110,CEA水平<10。在局限性肺癌患者中,我们发现LAP评分为152.4±36.7,CEA水平为22.7±48 ng/ml。97.7%的置信区间为:LAP评分>78.6,CEA水平>0。在广泛性肺癌患者中,我们发现LAP评分为272±49,CEA水平为47.5±80.4 ng/ml。97.7%的置信区间为:LAP评分>174,CEA水平>0。讨论了每个标志物的敏感性,这里以假阴性结果的百分比表示,记为PFN,意思是对于选定的标志物水平阈值,只有PFN%的患有特定疾病(如广泛性肺癌)的患者可能具有低于选定阈值的标志物水平,因此可能被认为是健康的。对于广泛性肺癌患者组,LAP评分的敏感性为0.05%PFN,我们得出结论,实际上LAP评分<110表明患有广泛性恶性肿瘤的可能性非常低。CEA水平的敏感性为32%PFN。对于局限性肺癌患者组,LAP评分对局限性肺癌的敏感性为12%PFN,而CEA为40%。LAP评分和CEA水平的特异性,以对照组中假阳性结果的百分比表示,是尚可的(2.3%),前提是除癌症外,其他可升高LAP评分和/或CEA水平的常见疾病是已知的,并且医生可以排除这些疾病。得出的结论是,作为广泛性肺癌的标志物,LAP评分比CEA水平有用得多。