Suppr超能文献

通过动脉脉搏分析进行无创心输出量测量与惰性气体再呼吸法的比较。

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by arterial pulse analysis compared with inert gas rebreathing.

作者信息

Stok W J, Baisch F, Hillebrecht A, Schulz H, Meyer M, Karemaker J M

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jun;74(6):2687-93. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2687.

Abstract

Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measured by arterial pulse analysis was compared with that measured by inert gas rebreathing in six healthy male volunteers. Pulse contour analysis was applied to the pressure wave output of a Finapres, which noninvasively measures continuous arterial pressure in a finger. Data were collected before, during, and after a 10-day 6 degrees head-down tilt experiment. Intravenous saline loading and lower body negative pressure stimuli varied CO over 2.8-9.6 l/min, as measured by the rebreathing technique. Because pulse contour provides only relative changes in CO, to obtain absolute values it must be calibrated against another measurement. Pulse contour data were calibrated every measurement day against the mean of two to four control rebreathing CO measurements before the lower body negative pressure or intravenous saline loading stimuli. Using one averaged calibration factor per subject for a total of 27 days, we compared the results of both methods. The linear regression between pulse contour (Pc CO) and rebreathing CO (Rebr CO) was Pc CO = 0.15 + 0.98(Rebr CO) (r = 0.96). The standard deviation of the difference of the two methods was 0.5 l/min (n = 205), excluding data used for calibration. By monitoring pulse contour CO before and during rebreathing, the rebreathing maneuver itself was shown to produce a substantial increase in CO that was mainly related to an increase in heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在六名健康男性志愿者中,对通过动脉脉搏分析测量的无创心输出量(CO)与通过惰性气体重呼吸测量的结果进行了比较。脉搏轮廓分析应用于Finapres的压力波输出,该设备可无创测量手指处的连续动脉压。在为期10天的6°头低位倾斜实验前、实验期间和实验后收集数据。通过重呼吸技术测量,静脉输注生理盐水和下体负压刺激使心输出量在2.8 - 9.6升/分钟范围内变化。由于脉搏轮廓仅提供心输出量的相对变化,要获得绝对值必须与另一种测量方法进行校准。在每个测量日,将脉搏轮廓数据与下体负压或静脉输注生理盐水刺激前两到四次对照重呼吸心输出量测量的平均值进行校准。使用每个受试者一个平均校准因子,共27天,我们比较了两种方法的结果。脉搏轮廓(Pc CO)与重呼吸心输出量(Rebr CO)之间的线性回归为Pc CO = 0.15 + 0.98(Rebr CO)(r = 0.96)。两种方法差异的标准差为0.5升/分钟(n = 205),不包括用于校准的数据。通过在重呼吸前和重呼吸期间监测脉搏轮廓心输出量,发现重呼吸操作本身会使心输出量大幅增加,这主要与心率增加有关。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验