Hassan Mohamed, Wagdy Kerolos, Kharabish Ahmed, Selwanos Peter Philip, Nabil Ahmed, Elguindy Ahmed, ElFaramawy Amr, Elmahdy Mahmoud F, Mahmoud Hani, Yacoub Magdi H
From the Cardiology Department (M.H., A.E., M.F.E.) and Radiology Department (A.K.), Cairo University, Egypt; Cardiology Department (M.H., K.W., P.P.S., A.E., H.M.), Radiology Department (A.K.), Biomedical Engineering Department (A.N.), and Cardiothoracic Department (M.H.Y.), Aswan Heart Centre, Egypt; and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (M.H.Y.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003592.
Cardiac output (CO) is a key indicator of cardiac function in patients with heart failure. No completely accurate method is available for measuring CO in all patients. The objective of this study was to validate CO measurement using the inert gas rebreathing (IGR) method against other noninvasive and invasive methods of CO quantification in a cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
The study included 97 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (age 42±15.5 years; 64 patients (65.9%) had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and 21 patients (21.6%) had ischemic heart disease). Median left ventricle ejection fraction was 24% (10%-36%). Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. CO was measured using 4 methods (IGR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac catheterization, and echocardiography) and indexed to body surface area (cardiac index [CI]). All studies were performed within 48 hours. Median CI measured by IGR was 1.75, by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was 1.82, by cardiac catheterization was 1.65, and by echo was 1.7 L·min·m. There were significant modest linear correlations between IGR-derived CI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-derived CI (=0.7; <0.001), as well as cardiac catheterization-derived CI (=0.6; <0.001). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the agreement between the IGR method and the other methods was as good as the agreement between any 2 other methods with each other.
The IGR method is a simple, accurate, and reproducible noninvasive method for quantification of CO in patients with advanced heart failure. The prognostic value of this simple measurement needs to be studied prospectively.
心输出量(CO)是心力衰竭患者心功能的关键指标。目前尚无适用于所有患者的完全准确的心输出量测量方法。本研究的目的是在一组射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,验证使用惰性气体再呼吸(IGR)法测量心输出量与其他非侵入性和侵入性心输出量定量方法的一致性。
本研究纳入了97例射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者(年龄42±15.5岁;64例(65.9%)患有特发性扩张型心肌病,21例(21.6%)患有缺血性心脏病)。左心室射血分数中位数为24%(10%-36%)。排除心房颤动患者。使用4种方法(IGR、心脏磁共振成像、心导管检查和超声心动图)测量心输出量,并将其标化至体表面积(心脏指数[CI])。所有检查均在48小时内完成。IGR测量的CI中位数为1.75,心脏磁共振成像测量的为1.82,心导管检查测量的为1.65,超声心动图测量的为1.7L·min·m。IGR衍生的CI与心脏磁共振成像衍生的CI之间存在显著的中度线性相关性(=0.7;<0.001),与心导管检查衍生的CI之间也存在显著的中度线性相关性(=0.6;<0.001)。使用Bland-Altman分析,IGR法与其他方法之间的一致性与任意两种其他方法之间相互的一致性相当。
IGR法是一种用于晚期心力衰竭患者心输出量定量的简单、准确且可重复的非侵入性方法。这种简单测量方法的预后价值需要进行前瞻性研究。