O'Brien E, Atkins N, Mee F, O'Malley K
Blood Pressure Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Hypertens. 1993 Jun;11(6):673-5. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199306000-00012.
To assess the accuracy of six ambulatory blood pressure measuring systems at low, medium and high blood pressures.
The CH-Druck, Profilomat, SpaceLabs 90207 and Novacor DIASYS 200R, having previously achieved A to C grading for systolic and diastolic blood pressures according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol and having fulfilled the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, have been recommended for measurement of ambulatory blood pressure in clinical practice; the Pressurometer IV and Takeda TM-2420, achieved only C and D grades and failed to satisfy the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria. In this study the data from the original validations are re-analysed for three pressure ranges of systolic and diastolic blood pressures: low range < or = 130/80 mmHg, medium range 130-160/80-100 mmHg and high range > or = 160/100 mmHg. All six devices maintained their overall grading or improved them slightly in the low and medium blood pressure ranges, but in the high blood pressure range the CH-Druck slipped from an overall A/A grading to B/C, the Profilomat from B/A to C/D, the SpaceLabs from B/B to C/C and the Pressurometer IV from C/D to D/D. The Takeda remained unchanged with a D grading, but the results within this grading were worse in the higher blood pressure range, and the Novacor rose from C/C to C/B.
This analysis suggests that the CH-Druck is the most accurate ambulatory system across the pressure range, although it does not perform as well in the high blood pressure range as in the medium and low blood pressure ranges. The SpaceLabs 90207 is accurate in the low and medium blood pressure ranges and reasonably accurate in the high blood pressure range. If blood pressures only in the low and medium ranges are to be measured, a wider selection of ambulatory systems becomes available because, in addition to the CH-Druck and SpaceLabs 90207, the Profiloat and Novacor DIASYS 200R are accurate.
评估六种动态血压测量系统在低、中、高血压水平时的准确性。
CH - Druck、Profilomat、SpaceLabs 90207和Novacor DIASYS 200R先前已根据英国高血压学会(BHS)方案在收缩压和舒张压方面获得A至C级评分,并符合美国医疗器械促进协会的标准,已被推荐用于临床实践中的动态血压测量;Pressurometer IV和武田TM - 2420仅获得C级和D级评分,未满足美国医疗器械促进协会的标准。在本研究中,对收缩压和舒张压的三个压力范围的原始验证数据进行了重新分析:低范围≤130/80 mmHg,中范围130 - 160/80 - 100 mmHg,高范围≥160/100 mmHg。所有六种设备在低和中血压范围内保持了总体评分或略有提高,但在高血压范围内,CH - Druck从总体A/A级降至B/C级,Profilomat从B/A级降至C/D级,SpaceLabs从B/B级降至C/C级,Pressurometer IV从C/D级降至D/D级。武田保持D级不变,但在较高血压范围内该等级内的结果更差,而Novacor从C/C级升至C/B级。
该分析表明,CH - Druck是在整个压力范围内最准确的动态血压系统,尽管它在高血压范围内的表现不如在中、低血压范围内。SpaceLabs 90207在低和中血压范围内准确,在高血压范围内也较为准确。如果仅测量低和中范围内的血压,可供选择的动态血压系统会更多,因为除了CH - Druck和SpaceLabs 90207外,Profiloat和Novacor DIASYS 200R也很准确。