Jantunen I T, Muhonen T T, Kataja V V, Flander M K, Teerenhovi L
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(12):1669-72. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90101-k.
166 patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were entered into a randomised prospective study in which the efficacy of single dose ondansetron 8 mg, tropisetron 5 mg and granisetron 3 mg in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting was evaluated. 130 patients were evaluable for analysis. During the 24 h following the start of chemotherapy complete control of vomiting was achieved in 80% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1; 86.9] of patients receiving granisetron compared with 75% (95% CI 67.1; 82.1) of those on tropisetron and 69% (95% CI 60.5; 76.5) on ondansetron. The patients experienced significantly fewer failures with granisetron (6.2%, 95% CI 2.1; 10.3) than with either ondansetron (14.6%, 95% CI 8.5; 20.6) or tropisetron (13.8%, 95% CI 7.9; 19.7). When asked, 34 (26%) patients out of 130 expressed no preference, 54 (42%) preferred granisetron, 22 (17%) preferred ondansetron and 20 (15%) preferred tropisetron. All the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were highly effective in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The observed differences in the control of emesis, although statistically significant, may not have clinical significance.
166名接受中度致吐性化疗的患者进入一项随机前瞻性研究,评估单剂量8毫克昂丹司琼、5毫克托烷司琼和3毫克格拉司琼预防急性呕吐的疗效。130名患者可纳入分析。化疗开始后的24小时内,接受格拉司琼的患者中80%[95%置信区间(CI)73.1;86.9]实现了呕吐的完全控制,相比之下,接受托烷司琼的患者为75%(95%CI 67.1;82.1),接受昂丹司琼的患者为69%(95%CI 60.5;76.5)。与昂丹司琼(14.6%,95%CI 8.5;20.6)或托烷司琼(13.8%,95%CI 7.9;19.7)相比,接受格拉司琼的患者出现失败的情况明显更少(6.2%,95%CI 2.1;10.3)。在接受询问时,130名患者中有34名(26%)表示无偏好,54名(42%)更喜欢格拉司琼,22名(17%)更喜欢昂丹司琼,20名(15%)更喜欢托烷司琼。所有5-HT3受体拮抗剂在预防中度致吐性化疗引起的急性呕吐方面都非常有效。观察到的在控制呕吐方面的差异虽然具有统计学意义,但可能没有临床意义。