Suppr超能文献

头孢拉定分析的液相色谱法比较研究

A comparative study of LC methods for analysis of cefradine.

作者信息

Hendrix C, Yongxin Z, Pijcke M, Roets E, Hoogmartens J

机构信息

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Laboratorium voor Farmaceutische Chemie, Instituut voor Farmaceutische Wetenschappen, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1993 Jul;11(7):595-9. doi: 10.1016/0731-7085(93)80010-x.

Abstract

A comparative study of two isocratic liquid chromatographic methods for the analysis of cefradine is described. The first method is prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia for the assay of cefradine, using classical alkyl bonded phase (C18) as the stationary phase. Poor reproducibility of the selectivity towards cefradine and its related substances was observed when this method was used and none of the C18 columns examined was able to separate cefradine completely from its potential related substances under the prescribed LC conditions. On the other hand, the second method, which uses poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) as the stationary phase, shows good selectivity even when using columns from different manufacturers and of different age. Four bulk samples of cefradine were analysed following both methods and the results were compared.

摘要

本文描述了两种用于头孢拉定分析的等度液相色谱方法的比较研究。第一种方法是欧洲药典规定的头孢拉定含量测定方法,使用经典的烷基键合相(C18)作为固定相。使用该方法时,对头孢拉定及其相关物质的选择性重现性较差,在所检查的C18色谱柱中,没有一根能够在规定的液相色谱条件下将头孢拉定与其潜在的相关物质完全分离。另一方面,第二种方法使用聚(苯乙烯 - 二乙烯基苯)作为固定相,即使使用不同制造商和不同使用年限的色谱柱,也显示出良好的选择性。按照这两种方法对四个头孢拉定原料药样品进行了分析,并对结果进行了比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验