Suppr超能文献

对邮件调查的回应:解释拒绝参与请求的影响。动脉粥样硬化风险社区(ARIC)研究调查人员。

Response to mail surveys: effect of a request to explain refusal to participate. The ARIC Study Investigators.

作者信息

Shahar E, Bisgard K M, Folsom A R

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1993 Sep;4(5):480-2.

PMID:8399698
Abstract

As part of a mailed health survey, we investigated the effect on the response rate of a request to explain refusal to participate. Subjects (N = 1,240) were randomized either to receive or not to receive, with the first mailing, a letter requesting an explanation of their decision not to fill out the questionnaire, if they chose that option. There was a slightly higher cumulative response during most of the study from subjects who had been sent the request, but little difference between the two study groups in the ultimate response rate [80% from the intervention group vs 83% from the control group; response rate difference = -3%; 95% confidence limits (CL) = -7%, 1%]. Of 209 individuals who were sent the request and did not return the questionnaire, only 15 (7%) sent back an explanation. A request to explain a refusal to participate in a mail survey neither jeopardized the response rate nor enhanced it.

摘要

作为一项邮寄式健康调查的一部分,我们研究了要求解释拒绝参与调查这一行为对回复率的影响。受试者(N = 1240)被随机分为两组,第一组在收到邮件时会收到一封信,信中要求他们如果选择不填写问卷需解释其决定,而第二组则不会收到该信件。在研究的大部分时间里,收到该要求的受试者的累积回复率略高,但两组最终的回复率差异不大[干预组为80%,对照组为83%;回复率差异 = -3%;95%置信区间(CL)= -7%,1%]。在收到要求但未返回问卷的209人中,只有15人(7%)寄回了解释。要求解释拒绝参与邮寄调查既不会降低回复率,也不会提高回复率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验