• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问卷顺序显著提高了向基层医疗医生发送的邮寄调查问卷的回复率。

Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians.

作者信息

Drummond Frances J, Sharp Linda, Carsin Anne-Elie, Kelleher Tracy, Comber Harry

机构信息

National Cancer Registry, Ireland, Elm Court, Boreenmanna Road, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.012
PMID:18177791
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Primary care physicians are increasingly being asked to participate in postal surveys. Difficulties in achieving adequate response rates among physicians have been reported. We investigated the effect of two low-cost interventions on response to a primary care physician postal questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A 2x2 factorial trial was developed within the context of a national survey assessing views and practices of physicians regarding prostate-specific antigen testing. We evaluated questionnaire order (version 1: demographics first, version 2: topic-specific questions first) and written precontact. A national database of primary care physicians was compiled. One thousand five hundred ninety-nine physicians were randomly selected, stratified by health board, and randomized.

RESULTS

47.9% of eligible physicians completed a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant 5.1% higher response rate among physicians receiving version 1 of the questionnaire than those receiving version 2 (50.6% vs. 45.4%, P=0.05); the adjusted odds of response were significantly raised (odds ratio=1.24; 95% confidence interval=1.01-1.54). Precontact resulted in a nonsignificant 3.6% increase in response (49.8% vs. 46.2%; P=0.16). The interventions did not interact.

CONCLUSION

Ordering questionnaires with general questions first can significantly increase response rates, whereas precontact can achieve a modest increase. These strategies may enhance response while adding little to the cost of a physician survey.

摘要

目的

基层医疗医生越来越多地被要求参与邮政调查。据报道,在医生中获得足够的回应率存在困难。我们调查了两种低成本干预措施对基层医疗医生邮政调查问卷回应率的影响。

研究设计与背景

在一项全国性调查的背景下开展了一项2×2析因试验,该调查评估医生对前列腺特异性抗原检测的看法和做法。我们评估了问卷顺序(版本1:先列人口统计学信息,版本2:先列特定主题问题)和书面预先接触。编制了一个基层医疗医生全国数据库。随机选择了1599名医生,按健康委员会分层并随机分组。

结果

47.9%的符合条件的医生完成了问卷。收到问卷版本1的医生的回应率比收到版本2的医生高5.1%,具有统计学意义(50.6%对45.4%,P = 0.05);调整后的回应几率显著提高(优势比 = 1.24;95%置信区间 = 1.01 - 1.54)。预先接触使回应率提高了3.6%,但无统计学意义(49.8%对46.2%;P = 0.16)。这两种干预措施没有相互作用。

结论

先列一般性问题的问卷顺序可显著提高回应率,而预先接触可适度提高回应率。这些策略可能会提高回应率,同时几乎不会增加医生调查的成本。

相似文献

1
Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians.问卷顺序显著提高了向基层医疗医生发送的邮寄调查问卷的回复率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
2
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.在一项随机试验中,对医生进行邮政调查的回复率高于电话访谈。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
3
In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate.在一项邮寄式医生调查中,问卷长度对回复率有阈值效应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):103-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.004.
4
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.回复率与代表性:抽奖激励提高了医生调查问卷的回复率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):571-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1126.
5
A comparison of general practitioner response rates to electronic and postal surveys in the setting of the National STI Prevention Program.国家性传播感染预防计划背景下,电子和邮寄调查中全科医生响应率的比较。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Apr;35(2):187-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00687.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
6
Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians.针对医生的邮件调查中的无应答偏倚。
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Jun;30(2):170-85. doi: 10.1177/0163278707300632.
7
Attitudes toward pay-for-performance initiatives among primary care osteopathic physicians in small group practices.小团体执业的初级保健整骨医师对绩效薪酬举措的态度。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Jan;108(1):21-4.
8
Attitudes, beliefs, and referral patterns of PCPs to bariatric surgeons.初级保健医生对减肥外科医生的态度、信念及转诊模式。
J Surg Res. 2008 Jan;144(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.038. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
9
Individual and area factors associated with general practitioner integration in Australia: a multilevel analysis.澳大利亚全科医生整合的个体和区域因素:一项多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(3):680-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
10
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.电子邮件还是普通邮件?关于哪种方式更适合调查的随机对照试验。
Can Fam Physician. 2004 Mar;50:414-9.

引用本文的文献

1
End-of-life medical decisions in French overseas departments: results of a retrospective survey.法国海外省的临终医疗决策:一项回顾性调查的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 9;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01552-x.
2
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
3
An Overview of Survey Research.调查研究概述。
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1309-1313. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11041. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.预先联系研究参与者是否会增加问卷调查的回应率:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 27;21(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01435-2.
5
Health Literacy Influences Men's Active and Passive Cancer Information Seeking.健康素养影响男性主动和被动获取癌症信息的行为。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Jul 19;3(3):e147-e160. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190430-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
ParticipACTION after 5 years of relaunch: a quantitative survey of Canadian organizational awareness and capacity regarding physical activity initiatives.重新启动 5 年后的 ParticipACTION:加拿大组织对体育活动倡议的意识和能力的定量调查。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Apr;38(4):162-169. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.4.02.
7
The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.招聘策略对全科医生调查回复率的有效性——一项系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 6;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76.
8
Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.提高肿瘤学研究中医生的响应率:一项结构化文献回顾和近期医生调查数据。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;106(6):1021-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.28. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.跟踪回复和邮寄日期对医生调查回复率的影响:三项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016942.
10
ParticipACTION: Baseline assessment of the 'new ParticipACTION': A quantitative survey of Canadian organizational awareness and capacity.参与行动:“新参与行动”的基线评估:对加拿大组织意识和能力的定量调查。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Dec 9;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-86.