Nunn J H, Ekanayake L, Rugg-Gunn A J, Saparamadu K D
Department of Child Dental Health, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Dental School, UK.
Community Dent Health. 1993 Jun;10(2):175-88.
Colour photographs were taken of the labial surface of both maxillary central incisor teeth of children aged 12 years, living in Sri Lanka and England. In each country, children were included who lived in communities receiving drinking water containing 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 ppm F, and within these communities children were classed as high or low socio-economic (SE) status. The photographs were examined 'blind' by two examiners independently. These pertained to 670 children, 332 in Sri Lanka and 338 in England. The index of Developmental Defects of Enamel (DDE) was used, as modified by Clarkson and O'Mullane (1989), to measure type and extent of opacity. Intra- and inter-examiner agreement was substantial. Prevalence of opacities ranged from about a quarter of teeth in the 0.1 ppm F area in Sri Lanka to over 60 per cent of teeth in the high socio-economic group in the 1.0 ppm F area in England. Higher prevalences of opacities were recorded in: (1) the high SE group than the low SE group in the 1.0 ppm F area in England, (2) the 1.0 ppm F area than in the 0.1 ppm F area in both countries, (3) in Sri Lanka than in England in low SE groups in the 1.0 ppm F areas. The greatest differences occurred in diffuse opacities. When these data were compared with results of clinical examinations of these same tooth-surfaces by one examiner (n = 506) more teeth were graded 'normal' clinically and more teeth graded as having opacities photographically. Both demarcated and diffuse opacities were scored more frequently from photographs than clinically in both countries.
对居住在斯里兰卡和英国的12岁儿童的上颌中切牙唇面拍摄了彩色照片。在每个国家,纳入了居住在饮用水含氟量分别为0.1、0.5和1.0 ppm社区的儿童,在这些社区内,儿童被划分为高或低社会经济地位。照片由两名检查人员独立“盲法”检查。这些照片涉及670名儿童,其中332名在斯里兰卡,338名在英国。采用克拉克森和奥马兰(1989年)修改后的釉质发育缺陷指数(DDE)来测量不透明度的类型和程度。检查人员内部和之间的一致性很高。不透明度的患病率范围从斯里兰卡0.1 ppm氟地区约四分之一的牙齿到英国1.0 ppm氟地区高社会经济组超过60%的牙齿。在以下情况中记录到更高的不透明度患病率:(1)在英国1.0 ppm氟地区,高社会经济组高于低社会经济组;(2)在两个国家,1.0 ppm氟地区高于0.1 ppm氟地区;(3)在1.0 ppm氟地区,斯里兰卡低社会经济组高于英国。最大的差异出现在弥漫性不透明度上。当将这些数据与同一名检查人员对这些相同牙齿表面的临床检查结果(n = 506)进行比较时,临床上更多的牙齿被评为“正常”,而照片上更多的牙齿被评为有不透明度。在两个国家,无论是界限性还是弥漫性不透明度,照片评分都比临床评分更频繁。