Eagle C J, Davies J M
Department of Anaesthesia, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Sep;40(9):851-62. doi: 10.1007/BF03009257.
The purpose of this review is to provide the practicing anaesthetist with an historical perspective of quality, a summary of current models, and an introduction to the expectations of accreditors. Articles were obtained from an electronic literature search on Silver Platter using the search terms Quality, Quality assurance, Anes, and Anaes. In addition, textbooks on quality assurance in health care, quality improvement texts from business management, and accreditation documents were reviewed. Quality systems in health care are derived from business or industrial models. Study of this field is hampered by poorly defined terminology and jargon. Over the years, many different models have been used in health care, but recent studies have investigated the effectiveness of methods such as Quality Improvement. Many of the systems used by hospitals appear to have been prompted by requirements of accreditation standards. Recently, systems of hospital organization have appeared which link Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement, risk management and utilization management. Despite the confusion created by ill-defined terminology and rapid change in some definitions, anaesthetists need to be aware of the basic models of accreditation requirements.
本综述的目的是为执业麻醉医师提供质量方面的历史视角、当前模式的总结以及对评审机构期望的介绍。文章通过在Silver Platter上进行电子文献检索获得,检索词为“质量”“质量保证”“麻醉”和“麻醉学”。此外,还查阅了医疗保健质量保证方面的教科书、工商管理领域的质量改进文本以及评审文件。医疗保健中的质量体系源自商业或工业模式。该领域的研究因术语定义不清和行话而受阻。多年来,医疗保健中使用了许多不同的模式,但最近的研究调查了诸如质量改进等方法的有效性。医院使用的许多系统似乎是由评审标准的要求推动的。最近,出现了将质量保证、质量改进、风险管理和利用管理联系起来的医院组织系统。尽管术语定义不明确以及某些定义迅速变化造成了混乱,但麻醉医师需要了解评审要求的基本模式。