• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培氟沙星/甲硝唑与多西环素/甲硝唑治疗腹腔镜确诊的急性盆腔炎的比较

A comparison of pefloxacin/metronidazole and doxycycline/metronidazole in the treatment of laparoscopically confirmed acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

作者信息

Witte E H, Peters A A, Smit I B, van der Linden M C, Mouton R P, van der Meer J W, van Erp E J

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Reproduction, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Jul;50(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90180-k.

DOI:10.1016/0028-2243(93)90180-k
PMID:8405644
Abstract

A double-blind, randomised study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of pefloxacin and metronidazole versus doxycycline and metronidazole in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). The clinical diagnosis had to be confirmed by laparoscopy before patients were included. Of the 74 patients who fulfilled the clinical criteria for PID, laparoscopy confirmed the diagnosis in only 40 patients (54%). The microorganism most frequently found as causative pathogen was Chlamydia trachomatis. Both treatment groups showed a good response to the study-medication. At discharge 9 patients in the pefloxacin group (45%) were cured and 10 patients (50%) had improved. In the doxycycline group 7 patients (35%) were cured and 10 patients (50%) had improved. Obviously pefloxacin/metronidazole and doxycycline/metronidazole are equally effective in the treatment of PID.

摘要

进行了一项双盲随机研究,比较培氟沙星与甲硝唑联合用药和多西环素与甲硝唑联合用药治疗盆腔炎(PID)患者的疗效和安全性。在纳入患者之前,临床诊断必须通过腹腔镜检查来确认。在74例符合PID临床标准的患者中,只有40例(54%)经腹腔镜检查确诊。最常被发现为致病病原体的微生物是沙眼衣原体。两个治疗组对研究药物均显示出良好反应。出院时,培氟沙星组有9例患者(45%)治愈,10例患者(50%)病情改善。多西环素组有7例患者(35%)治愈,10例患者(50%)病情改善。显然,培氟沙星/甲硝唑和多西环素/甲硝唑在治疗PID方面同样有效。

相似文献

1
A comparison of pefloxacin/metronidazole and doxycycline/metronidazole in the treatment of laparoscopically confirmed acute pelvic inflammatory disease.培氟沙星/甲硝唑与多西环素/甲硝唑治疗腹腔镜确诊的急性盆腔炎的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Jul;50(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90180-k.
2
A comparison of ciprofloxacin with doxycycline plus metronidazole in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.环丙沙星与多西环素联合甲硝唑治疗急性盆腔炎的比较
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1989;60:66-73.
3
Treating pelvic inflammatory disease with doxycycline and metronidazole or penicillin and metronidazole.使用强力霉素和甲硝唑或青霉素和甲硝唑治疗盆腔炎。
Genitourin Med. 1986 Aug;62(4):235-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.62.4.235.
4
The effect of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline plus metronidazole on lower genital tract flora in patients with proven pelvic inflammatory disease.环丙沙星、强力霉素联合甲硝唑对确诊为盆腔炎患者下生殖道菌群的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991;249(2):95-101. doi: 10.1007/BF02390368.
5
[Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole vs. cefoxitin/doxycycline: comparison of two therapy schedules for treatment of acute pelvic infection].[环丙沙星/甲硝唑与头孢西丁/多西环素:两种治疗急性盆腔感染方案的比较]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Jun;54(6):337-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022851.
6
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin as monotherapy or combined with metronidazole compared with two standard multidrug regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.阿奇霉素单药治疗或联合甲硝唑治疗与两种标准多药方案治疗急性盆腔炎的疗效和安全性比较。
J Int Med Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/147323000303100108.
7
Fecundity and morbidity following acute pelvic inflammatory disease treated with doxycycline and metronidazole.用强力霉素和甲硝唑治疗急性盆腔炎后的生育力和发病率
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;268(4):284-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0376-6. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
8
A randomized double-blind comparison of moxifloxacin and doxycycline/metronidazole/ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease.莫西沙星与多西环素/甲硝唑/环丙沙星治疗急性单纯性盆腔炎的随机双盲对照研究
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Oct;20(10):690-5. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008495.
9
Factors predicting abnormal hysterosalpingographic findings in patients treated for acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1985 Jun;23(3):171-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(85)90100-6.
10
Oral clindamycin and ciprofloxacin versus intramuscular ceftriaxone and oral doxycycline in the treatment of mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease in outpatients.
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Feb;24(2):170-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.2.170.

引用本文的文献

1
Can ceftriaxone be omitted in the treatment of nongonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease?
Int J STD AIDS. 2021 Sep;32(10):981-982. doi: 10.1177/09564624211004415. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
3
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
4
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):658-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.658.