• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用较少数量兔子评估工业化学品皮肤刺激潜力的可靠性。

Reliability of using fewer rabbits to evaluate dermal irritation potential of industrial chemicals.

作者信息

Derelanko M J, Finegan C E, Dunn B J

机构信息

Department of Toxicology, AlliedSignal Inc., Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1139.

出版信息

Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Aug;21(2):159-63. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1085.

DOI:10.1006/faat.1993.1085
PMID:8405778
Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of using fewer than six animals for dermal irritation testing, a retrospective evaluation was conducted on data from 224 studies performed within the last 10 years using standard methodology. For each study, an irritation classification was made from primary dermal irritation indices calculated using irritancy data available for five, four, or three rabbits randomly selected from the original six-rabbit pool. The original six-rabbit analyses resulted in classification of 49 non-irritants, 75 negligible irritants, 66 mild irritants, 24 moderate irritants, and 10 severe irritants. Agreement with the six-rabbit classification was obtained for five-, four-, and three-rabbit groups, respectively, as follows: for negligible irritants, 95, 85, and 69%; mild irritants, 85, 80, and 76%; moderate irritants, 88, 88, and 71%; severe irritants, 100, 90, and 90%. Differences in the dermal irritation indices between groups of six and five, four, and three rabbits were small, with an average difference no larger than 0.3. When disagreements in classification occurred, the test material was most often classified less severe. Using 90% or greater agreement as acceptable criterion for reducing the number of test animals, our results suggest that the use of less than six rabbits would not be suitable for evaluating dermal irritation based solely on a qualitative classification. However, the use of as few as three rabbits would be adequate to evaluate dermal irritancy based on quantitative primary dermal irritancy values.

摘要

为了研究在皮肤刺激性试验中使用少于6只动物的可行性,对过去10年使用标准方法进行的224项研究的数据进行了回顾性评估。对于每项研究,根据从最初的6只兔子中随机选择的5只、4只或3只兔子的刺激性数据计算出的原发性皮肤刺激指数进行刺激分类。最初的6只兔子分析结果为:49种非刺激性物质、75种可忽略刺激性物质、66种轻度刺激性物质、24种中度刺激性物质和10种重度刺激性物质。5只、4只和3只兔子组与6只兔子分类的一致性分别如下:可忽略刺激性物质,分别为95%、85%和69%;轻度刺激性物质,分别为85%、80%和76%;中度刺激性物质,分别为88%、88%和71%;重度刺激性物质,分别为100%、90%和90%。6只兔子组与5只、4只和3只兔子组之间的皮肤刺激指数差异很小,平均差异不超过0.3。当分类出现分歧时,受试材料最常被分类为较轻的严重程度。以90%或更高的一致性作为减少试验动物数量的可接受标准,我们的结果表明,仅基于定性分类,使用少于6只兔子不适合评估皮肤刺激性。然而,仅使用3只兔子就足以根据定量的原发性皮肤刺激值评估皮肤刺激性。

相似文献

1
Reliability of using fewer rabbits to evaluate dermal irritation potential of industrial chemicals.使用较少数量兔子评估工业化学品皮肤刺激潜力的可靠性。
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Aug;21(2):159-63. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1085.
2
The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)关于急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的国际验证研究:试验化学品的选择
Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec;35(6):603-19. doi: 10.1177/026119290703500608.
3
Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results.根据皮肤刺激性试验结果预测眼刺激性潜力。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1984 Feb;22(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(84)90097-8.
4
An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures.一种用于检测皮肤刺激物的体外模型:人皮肤外植体培养物的甲基绿-派洛宁染色
Toxicol In Vitro. 2002 Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00039-5.
5
Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.评估一种分层体外测试策略,以评估用于工人安全的药物化合物的眼和皮肤刺激/腐蚀潜力。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018 Dec;37(4):380-390. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2018.1483944. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
A simple method for screening assessment of skin and eye irritation.一种用于皮肤和眼睛刺激性筛查评估的简单方法。
J Toxicol Sci. 1994 Feb;19(1):25-35. doi: 10.2131/jts.19.25.
7
Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.选定工业化学品的体内(德雷兹法)和体外(腐蚀试验法)皮肤腐蚀性数值比较。
Int J Toxicol. 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):99-107. doi: 10.1080/10915810305094.
8
Re: "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals".主题:“选定工业化学品的体内(德莱兹方法)和体外(腐蚀试验)皮肤腐蚀性值的比较”
Int J Toxicol. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):475-6; author response 476-8. doi: 10.1177/109158180302200609.
9
[Draize test and alternative methods for evaluating irritation from chemical substances].[德莱兹试验及评估化学物质刺激性的替代方法]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1995;46(2):163-8.
10
An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system.眼部刺激试验方案及评估与分类系统。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Feb;31(2):117-21. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90124-h.