Derelanko M J, Finegan C E, Dunn B J
Department of Toxicology, AlliedSignal Inc., Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1139.
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Aug;21(2):159-63. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1085.
To investigate the feasibility of using fewer than six animals for dermal irritation testing, a retrospective evaluation was conducted on data from 224 studies performed within the last 10 years using standard methodology. For each study, an irritation classification was made from primary dermal irritation indices calculated using irritancy data available for five, four, or three rabbits randomly selected from the original six-rabbit pool. The original six-rabbit analyses resulted in classification of 49 non-irritants, 75 negligible irritants, 66 mild irritants, 24 moderate irritants, and 10 severe irritants. Agreement with the six-rabbit classification was obtained for five-, four-, and three-rabbit groups, respectively, as follows: for negligible irritants, 95, 85, and 69%; mild irritants, 85, 80, and 76%; moderate irritants, 88, 88, and 71%; severe irritants, 100, 90, and 90%. Differences in the dermal irritation indices between groups of six and five, four, and three rabbits were small, with an average difference no larger than 0.3. When disagreements in classification occurred, the test material was most often classified less severe. Using 90% or greater agreement as acceptable criterion for reducing the number of test animals, our results suggest that the use of less than six rabbits would not be suitable for evaluating dermal irritation based solely on a qualitative classification. However, the use of as few as three rabbits would be adequate to evaluate dermal irritancy based on quantitative primary dermal irritancy values.
为了研究在皮肤刺激性试验中使用少于6只动物的可行性,对过去10年使用标准方法进行的224项研究的数据进行了回顾性评估。对于每项研究,根据从最初的6只兔子中随机选择的5只、4只或3只兔子的刺激性数据计算出的原发性皮肤刺激指数进行刺激分类。最初的6只兔子分析结果为:49种非刺激性物质、75种可忽略刺激性物质、66种轻度刺激性物质、24种中度刺激性物质和10种重度刺激性物质。5只、4只和3只兔子组与6只兔子分类的一致性分别如下:可忽略刺激性物质,分别为95%、85%和69%;轻度刺激性物质,分别为85%、80%和76%;中度刺激性物质,分别为88%、88%和71%;重度刺激性物质,分别为100%、90%和90%。6只兔子组与5只、4只和3只兔子组之间的皮肤刺激指数差异很小,平均差异不超过0.3。当分类出现分歧时,受试材料最常被分类为较轻的严重程度。以90%或更高的一致性作为减少试验动物数量的可接受标准,我们的结果表明,仅基于定性分类,使用少于6只兔子不适合评估皮肤刺激性。然而,仅使用3只兔子就足以根据定量的原发性皮肤刺激值评估皮肤刺激性。