• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管测压在临床实践中的作用审计

Audit of the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

作者信息

Johnston P W, Johnston B T, Collins B J, Collins J S, Love A H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.

出版信息

Gut. 1993 Sep;34(9):1158-61. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.9.1158.

DOI:10.1136/gut.34.9.1158
PMID:8406145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1375445/
Abstract

This oesophageal laboratory serves a population of 1.5 million. The study aimed to review referral patterns and assess the cost effectiveness of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice. All 276 consecutive manometry studies performed between 1988 and 1991 were reviewed. Reasons for referral in the 268 first referrals were: dysphagia 50.4%, non-cardiac chest pain 23.1%, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 14.2%, connective tissue disease 11.2%, and 'other' 1.1%. Manometry was normal in 49.3%, showed achalasia in 17.9%, diffuse oesophageal spasm in 13.4%, connective tissue disease in 7.8%, hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter in 4.5%, nutcracker oesophagus in 2.6%, and 'other' in 4.5%. A positive diagnosis was significantly more common if dysphagia was the reason for referral (65.9% v 35.3%, p < 0.01). A positive diagnosis was established in 60% of patients referred with connective tissue disease, 30.6% with non-cardiac chest pain, and 21.1% with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A positive diagnosis was significantly more common in connective tissue disease when symptoms were present (85% v 10%, p < 0.05). Management was changed in 48.9% of all patients because of manometry findings. The cost of each oesophageal manometry study was calculated to be 63.00 pounds: every change in patient management cost 129.00 pounds. In conclusion, oesophageal manometry changed management in over 20% of patients with non-cardiac chest pain or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and in over 60% of those with dysphagia. It is, therefore, a useful and cost effective test in patients with these symptoms.

摘要

这家食管实验室服务于150万人口。该研究旨在回顾转诊模式并评估食管测压在临床实践中的成本效益。回顾了1988年至1991年间连续进行的所有276项测压研究。268例首次转诊患者的转诊原因如下:吞咽困难占50.4%,非心源性胸痛占23.1%,胃食管反流病占14.2%,结缔组织病占11.2%,“其他”占1.1%。测压结果正常的占49.3%,显示贲门失弛缓症的占17.9%,弥漫性食管痉挛的占13.4%,结缔组织病的占7.8%,食管下括约肌高压的占4.5%,胡桃夹食管的占2.6%,“其他”的占4.5%。如果以吞咽困难作为转诊原因,阳性诊断显著更常见(65.9%对35.3%,p<0.01)。结缔组织病转诊患者中60%确诊,非心源性胸痛转诊患者中30.6%确诊,胃食管反流病转诊患者中21.1%确诊。结缔组织病患者出现症状时阳性诊断显著更常见(85%对10%,p<0.05)。由于测压结果,所有患者中有48.9%的治疗方案发生了改变。每项食管测压研究的成本计算为63.00英镑:患者治疗方案的每次改变花费129.00英镑。总之,食管测压改变了超过20%的非心源性胸痛或胃食管反流病患者以及超过60%的吞咽困难患者的治疗方案。因此,对于有这些症状的患者,它是一项有用且具有成本效益的检查。

相似文献

1
Audit of the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.食管测压在临床实践中的作用审计
Gut. 1993 Sep;34(9):1158-61. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.9.1158.
2
Nutcracker oesophagus: association with chest pain and dysphagia controlling for gastro-oesophageal reflux.胡桃夹食管:与胸痛及吞咽困难的关联——对胃食管反流进行控制的研究
Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;40(9):717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
3
Does this patient have oesophageal motility abnormality or pathological acid reflux?该患者是否存在食管动力异常或病理性胃酸反流?
Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Jul;37(7):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.01.018. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
4
Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice.临床实践中动态24小时食管pH监测的五年审计
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;34(7):676-82. doi: 10.1080/003655299750025877.
5
Esophageal hypermotility: cause or effect?食管运动功能亢进:是因还是果?
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):497-502. doi: 10.1111/dote.12367. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
6
Role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.食管测压在临床实践中的作用。
Dis Esophagus. 1999;12(1):41-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00013.x.
7
A review of oesophageal manometry testing in a district general hospital.某区综合医院食管测压检查综述
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jan;78(915):34-6. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.915.34.
8
Ineffective oesophageal motility: manometric subsets exhibit different symptom profiles.食管动力障碍:测压亚组表现出不同的症状特征。
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun 21;14(23):3719-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3719.
9
Assessment of oesophageal motor function in patients with dysphagia or chest pain - the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative experience.吞咽困难或胸痛患者食管运动功能的评估——临床结果研究计划的经验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Dec;18(11-12):1083-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01772.x.
10
Clinical implications of abnormal oesophageal motility.食管动力异常的临床意义。
Br J Surg. 1987 May;74(5):416-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740533.

引用本文的文献

1
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.英国胃肠病学会食管测压和食管反流监测指南。
Gut. 2019 Oct;68(10):1731-1750. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Comparison of the efficiencies of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and esophagus pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.食管测压、向量容积分析和食管pH监测在胃食管反流诊断中的效率比较。
Turk Pediatri Ars. 2015 Dec 1;50(4):226-33. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2015.2839. eCollection 2015 Dec.
3
Symptomatic outcome following laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with Dor fundoplication versus laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with angle of His accentuation: results of a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜下Heller贲门肌切开术联合Dor胃底折叠术与腹腔镜下Heller贲门肌切开术联合His角强化术的症状性结局:一项随机对照试验的结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2344-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3958-z. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
4
Clinical utility of selective esophageal manometry in a tertiary care setting.三级医疗环境中选择性食管测压的临床应用价值。
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Jul;54(7):1481-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0518-1. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.药物治疗或手术(腹腔镜胃底折叠术)治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003.
6
Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.食管动力障碍(IEM):非特异性食管动力障碍患者的主要表现。
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Sep;42(9):1859-65. doi: 10.1023/a:1018802908358.
7
Ambulatory esophageal pH testing. Referral patterns, indication, and treatment in a Canadian teaching hospital.动态食管pH检测。加拿大一家教学医院的转诊模式、适应症及治疗情况
Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Jun;41(6):1102-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02088226.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophageal disease in patients with angina-like chest pain.伴有心绞痛样胸痛患者的食管疾病
Am J Gastroenterol. 1981 Feb;75(2):116-23.
2
Esophageal manometry: a benefit and cost analysis.食管测压法:效益与成本分析
Dig Dis Sci. 1982 Sep;27(9):772-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01391368.
3
Clinical applications of oesophageal motility studies?食管动力研究的临床应用?
Br J Hosp Med. 1984 Nov;32(5):267-71.
4
Oesophageal chest pain: a point of view.食管性胸痛:一种观点。
Gut. 1984 Jan;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.1.1.
5
Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.非心源性胸痛或吞咽困难患者的食管检测。1161例患者三年的经验结果。
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):593-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-593.
6
Long-term follow-up of symptomatic status of patients with noncardiac chest pain: is diagnosis of esophageal etiology helpful?非心源性胸痛患者症状状态的长期随访:食管病因诊断是否有帮助?
Am J Gastroenterol. 1987 Mar;82(3):215-8.
7
Mind over manometry.心理战胜测压法。
Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1988 Nov 30;23(11A):4, 7-8, 11.
8
Studies in esophageal motility: five year clinical experience in a Canadian tertiary care hospital.食管动力研究:加拿大一家三级医疗医院的五年临床经验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul;9(3):191-4.
9
Esophageal motility testing: shadow and substance.食管动力测试:影像与实质
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul;9(3):185-6.
10
Controversies, dilemmas, and dialogues. In the community hospital setting, what is the role of esophageal manometry?争议、困境与对话。在社区医院环境中,食管测压的作用是什么?
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Feb;85(2):129-31.