• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伤寒的临床特征与转归

Clinical profile and outcome in enteric fever.

作者信息

Sharma A, Gathwala G

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College, Rohtak, Haryana.

出版信息

Indian Pediatr. 1993 Jan;30(1):47-50.

PMID:8406706
Abstract

Sixty five blood culture positive cases of S. typhi were studied for clinical profile. A total of 64.6% were multidrug resistant and 35.4% were chloramphenicol sensitive. In patients with multidrug resistant S. typhi the age was higher (p < 0.01), and incidence of complications such as shock (35.7%), encephalopathy (42.9%), myocarditis (14.3%) and gastric hemorrhage (4.7%) were more frequent, compared to chloramphenicol sensitive group. Cases with multidrug resistant S. typhi (MDRST) were treated with oral ciprofloxacin; the period of defervescence of fever was significantly less (p < 0.05) compared to the chloramphenicol group. Our study suggests the use of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of MDRST without any side effects.

摘要

对65例血培养伤寒沙门氏菌阳性病例的临床特征进行了研究。共有64.6%为多重耐药,35.4%对氯霉素敏感。与氯霉素敏感组相比,多重耐药伤寒沙门氏菌患者年龄较大(p<0.01),休克(35.7%)、脑病(42.9%)、心肌炎(14.3%)和胃出血(4.7%)等并发症的发生率更高。多重耐药伤寒沙门氏菌(MDRST)病例采用口服环丙沙星治疗;与氯霉素组相比,发热退热期明显缩短(p<0.05)。我们的研究表明,使用环丙沙星治疗MDRST没有任何副作用。

相似文献

1
Clinical profile and outcome in enteric fever.伤寒的临床特征与转归
Indian Pediatr. 1993 Jan;30(1):47-50.
2
A clinical profile of multidrug resistant typhoid fever.多重耐药伤寒热的临床概况
Indian Pediatr. 1991 Oct;28(10):1171-4.
3
Chloramphenicol resistant enteric fever.
J Indian Med Assoc. 1993 Jan;91(1):10-3.
4
Multi drug resistant Salmonella typhi infection: clinical profile and therapy.
Indian Pediatr. 1991 Apr;28(4):357-61.
5
Evaluation of antibiotic sensitivity pattern in cases of enteric fever in north west Rajasthan.拉贾斯坦邦西北部伤寒病例抗生素敏感性模式评估
J Indian Med Assoc. 2008 Aug;106(8):528-30, 532.
6
Suboptimal clinical response to ciprofloxacin in patients with enteric fever due to Salmonella spp. with reduced fluoroquinolone susceptibility: a case series.氟喹诺酮敏感性降低的沙门氏菌所致肠热症患者对环丙沙星的临床反应欠佳:病例系列
BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 20;4:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-36.
7
Present status of drug resistance in cases of enteric fever in Rajasthan.
J Assoc Physicians India. 1996 Sep;44(9):618-9.
8
A study of culture positive multidrug resistant enteric fever--changing pattern and emerging resistance to ciprofloxacin.
J Assoc Physicians India. 1994 Aug;42(8):599-600.
9
Efficacy of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in multidrug resistant enteric fever in adults.环丙沙星和诺氟沙星在成人多重耐药性伤寒中的疗效。
J Indian Med Assoc. 1993 Jun;91(6):156-7.
10
Ciprofloxacin in the management of multiple drug resistant typhoid fever.环丙沙星在多重耐药伤寒热治疗中的应用
Indian Pediatr. 1991 Apr;28(4):417-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Occurrence of Typhoid Fever Complications and Their Relation to Duration of Illness Preceding Hospitalization: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.伤寒并发症的发生及其与住院前病程的关系:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(Suppl 6):S435-S448. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz477.
2
ENTERIC FEVER - CULTURE AND SENSITIVITY PATTERN AND TREATMENT OUTCOME.伤寒 - 培养及药敏模式与治疗结果
Med J Armed Forces India. 1995 Apr;51(2):83-86. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30934-6. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Typhoid Fever Presenting as Acute Psychosis.
以急性精神病为表现的伤寒热
Med J Armed Forces India. 2003 Jul;59(3):252-3. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(03)80023-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
A case of Empyema thoracic due to Salmonella typhi in 18-month-old child: an unusual cause.一名18个月大儿童因伤寒沙门氏菌引起的胸腔积脓病例:一个不寻常的病因。
J Lab Physicians. 2012 Jan;4(1):45-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.98673.
5
The concurrent prevalence of chloramphenicol-sensitive and multi-drug resistant Salmonella typhi in Vellore, S. India.印度南部韦洛尔伤寒沙门氏菌对氯霉素敏感和多重耐药的同时流行情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 1996 Apr;116(2):225-7. doi: 10.1017/s095026880005247x.