• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋病奈瑟菌体外药敏试验的头孢唑肟解释标准。

Ceftizoxime interpretive criteria for in vitro susceptibility tests with Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

作者信息

Barrett M S, Jones R N, Erwin M E

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2531-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2531-2532.1993.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.31.9.2531-2532.1993
PMID:8408583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC265803/
Abstract

Ceftizoxime was tested in triplicate against 100 clinical strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in accordance with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines to establish susceptibility testing interpretive criteria. The MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested were 0.008 and 0.03 microgram/ml, respectively. These results confirm those of other studies reporting ceftizoxime's excellent activity against gonococci. Because no resistant strains were identified, a breakpoint MIC of < or = 0.5 microgram/ml was selected, with a correlate zone diameter of > or = 32 mm. Ceftizoxime appears to represent an alternative to other beta-lactamase-stable beta-lactams for cost-effective therapy of uncomplicated gonorrhea.

摘要

按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的指南,对100株淋病奈瑟菌临床菌株进行了头孢唑肟的三重测试,以确定药敏试验的解释标准。受试菌株中50%和90%的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)分别为0.008微克/毫升和0.03微克/毫升。这些结果证实了其他研究报告的头孢唑肟对淋球菌具有优异活性的结果。由于未鉴定出耐药菌株,因此选择了≤0.5微克/毫升的断点MIC,相关抑菌圈直径≥32毫米。对于单纯性淋病的经济有效治疗,头孢唑肟似乎是其他对β-内酰胺酶稳定的β-内酰胺类药物的替代选择。

相似文献

1
Ceftizoxime interpretive criteria for in vitro susceptibility tests with Neisseria gonorrhoeae.淋病奈瑟菌体外药敏试验的头孢唑肟解释标准。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2531-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2531-2532.1993.
2
Interpretive criteria for susceptibility tests with DU-6859a and FK-037 tested against Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.针对流感嗜血杆菌和淋病奈瑟菌对DU-6859a和FK-037进行药敏试验的解释标准。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jun;19(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90119-8.
3
Susceptibility testing interpretive criteria and drug stability for cefdinir, cefetamet, and cefpodoxime against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.头孢地尼、头孢他美酯和头孢泊肟酯对淋病奈瑟菌的药敏试验解释标准及药物稳定性
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov-Dec;15(8):685-91. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90072-2.
4
Interpretive criteria for cefodizime in vitro susceptibility tests with Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Oct;17(3):243-5. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90105-g.
5
Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ceftizoxime in vitro and in vivo.
Chemotherapy. 1984;30(5):322-7. doi: 10.1159/000238287.
6
Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to cefpodoxime: determination of MICs and disk diffusion zone diameters.淋病奈瑟菌对头孢泊肟的敏感性:最低抑菌浓度(MICs)及纸片扩散法抑菌圈直径的测定
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):497-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.3.497.
7
Interpretive criteria for susceptibility testing of CI-960 (PD127391, AM-1091), fleroxacin, lomefloxacin, and temafloxacin against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including drug stability in GC agar medium.CI-960(PD127391,AM-1091)、氟罗沙星、洛美沙星和替马沙星对淋病奈瑟菌药敏试验的解释标准,包括在GC琼脂培养基中的药物稳定性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1170-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1170-1173.1992.
8
Antimicrobial activity of trovafloxacin tested against ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Interpretive criteria and comparisons with Etest results.针对环丙沙星敏感和耐药的淋病奈瑟菌测试曲伐沙星的抗菌活性。解释标准及与Etest结果的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Aug;28(4):193-200. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00042-4.
9
Emergence of cephem- and aztreonam-high-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae that does not produce beta-lactamase.不产生β-内酰胺酶的头孢菌素和氨曲南高耐药淋病奈瑟菌的出现。
J Infect Chemother. 2001 Mar;7(1):49-50. doi: 10.1007/s101560170034.
10
MIC and disk diffusion quality control guidelines for Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility tests of cefdinir, cefetamet, CI-960, fleroxacin, lomefloxacin, and temafloxacin.淋病奈瑟菌对头孢地尼、头孢他美、CI-960、氟罗沙星、洛美沙星和替马沙星敏感性试验的MIC及纸片扩散法质量控制指南。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1317-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1317-1319.1992.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro antimicrobial activity of eight new beta-lactam antibiotics against penicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae.八种新型β-内酰胺抗生素对耐青霉素淋病奈瑟菌的体外抗菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):541-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.23.4.541.
2
Ceftizoxime (FK-749) is effective therapy for urethritis caused by penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae.头孢唑肟(FK-749)是治疗由产青霉素酶淋病奈瑟菌引起的尿道炎的有效疗法。
Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Jan-Mar;11(1):30-1. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198401000-00007.
3
Ceftizoxime in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea.头孢唑肟治疗单纯性淋病。
Br J Vener Dis. 1984 Apr;60(2):90-1. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.2.90.
4
Experience with ceftizoxime: an overall summary of clinical trials in Japan.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Nov;10 Suppl C:311-26. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.311.
5
Ceftizoxime: collaborative multiphased in-vitro evaluation including tentative interpretive standards for disc susceptibility tests, beta-lactamase stability, and inhibition.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Nov;10 Suppl C:25-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.25.
6
Ceftizoxime for treatment of gonorrhoea.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Nov;10 Suppl C:237-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.237.
7
Comparison of ceftizoxime and penicillin for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Nov;10 Suppl C:229-35. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.229.
8
Pharmacology of ceftizoxime compared with that of cefamandole.头孢唑肟与头孢孟多的药理学比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Sep;20(3):366-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.20.3.366.
9
Treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis with single-dose ceftizoxime.
Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Oct-Dec;17(4):181-3. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199010000-00006.
10
Efficacy of ceftizoxime in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea: comparison with amoxycillin.
Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Jun;44(6):216-8.