Breslow R A, Sorkin J D
Westat, Rockville, Maryland.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Sep;41(9):923-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06756.x.
To determine whether a 1-day calorie count can replace the labor-intensive 3-day calorie count commonly, performed in hospitalized patients when estimates of caloric and protein intake are required.
Pilot study using prospective, non-concurrent review of medical records.
Hospital.
Thirty patients (mean age 67 years).
Mean 3-day intake (952 +/- 91 calories, 41 +/- 4 g protein) was about half of calculated requirements; first-day intake was similar (918 +/- 116 calories, 40 +/- 5 g protein). The first day had high sensitivity (calories 96%; protein 93%) and positive predictive value (calories 100%; protein 96%). Malnutrition was evident; three-fourths of patients had weights below recommended ranges, and 83% were hypoalbuminemic.
Three-day calorie counts are frequently performed in patients suspected of eating poorly. Results of this pilot study suggest that 1-day calorie counts may be a valid alternative. However, readily available anthropometric and biochemical data may be as good an indicator of inadequate dietary intake.
确定在需要估算热量和蛋白质摄入量时,1天的热量计数是否可以取代通常在住院患者中进行的耗时费力的3天热量计数。
采用前瞻性、非同期病历回顾的试点研究。
医院。
30名患者(平均年龄67岁)。
3天的平均摄入量(952±91卡路里,41±4克蛋白质)约为计算需求量的一半;第一天的摄入量与之相似(918±116卡路里,40±5克蛋白质)。第一天具有较高的敏感性(热量96%;蛋白质93%)和阳性预测值(热量100%;蛋白质96%)。营养不良很明显;四分之三的患者体重低于推荐范围,83%的患者白蛋白水平低。
怀疑饮食不佳的患者经常进行3天热量计数。这项试点研究的结果表明,1天热量计数可能是一种有效的替代方法。然而,现有的人体测量和生化数据可能同样是饮食摄入不足的良好指标。