Suppr超能文献

住院患者一日与三日卡路里计数的比较:一项试点研究。

Comparison of one-day and three-day calorie counts in hospitalized patients: a pilot study.

作者信息

Breslow R A, Sorkin J D

机构信息

Westat, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Sep;41(9):923-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06756.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a 1-day calorie count can replace the labor-intensive 3-day calorie count commonly, performed in hospitalized patients when estimates of caloric and protein intake are required.

DESIGN

Pilot study using prospective, non-concurrent review of medical records.

SETTING

Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty patients (mean age 67 years).

RESULTS

Mean 3-day intake (952 +/- 91 calories, 41 +/- 4 g protein) was about half of calculated requirements; first-day intake was similar (918 +/- 116 calories, 40 +/- 5 g protein). The first day had high sensitivity (calories 96%; protein 93%) and positive predictive value (calories 100%; protein 96%). Malnutrition was evident; three-fourths of patients had weights below recommended ranges, and 83% were hypoalbuminemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-day calorie counts are frequently performed in patients suspected of eating poorly. Results of this pilot study suggest that 1-day calorie counts may be a valid alternative. However, readily available anthropometric and biochemical data may be as good an indicator of inadequate dietary intake.

摘要

目的

确定在需要估算热量和蛋白质摄入量时,1天的热量计数是否可以取代通常在住院患者中进行的耗时费力的3天热量计数。

设计

采用前瞻性、非同期病历回顾的试点研究。

地点

医院。

参与者

30名患者(平均年龄67岁)。

结果

3天的平均摄入量(952±91卡路里,41±4克蛋白质)约为计算需求量的一半;第一天的摄入量与之相似(918±116卡路里,40±5克蛋白质)。第一天具有较高的敏感性(热量96%;蛋白质93%)和阳性预测值(热量100%;蛋白质96%)。营养不良很明显;四分之三的患者体重低于推荐范围,83%的患者白蛋白水平低。

结论

怀疑饮食不佳的患者经常进行3天热量计数。这项试点研究的结果表明,1天热量计数可能是一种有效的替代方法。然而,现有的人体测量和生化数据可能同样是饮食摄入不足的良好指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验