• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.

作者信息

Pitt M A, Samuel A G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):699-725. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.699.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.699
PMID:8409855
Abstract

Recent studies that used Ganong's (1980) identification task have produced discrepant results. The present study sought to resolve these discrepancies by examining the influence of methodological factors on phoneme identification and differences in data analysis techniques. Three factors were examined across 2 experiments: position of target phoneme, phonetic contrast, and 2 task conditions in which stimulus quality (S/N ratio) or cognitive load varied. A meta-analysis was then performed on the results from all identification studies, including the present one, in an effort to obtain additional insight on factors that influence the task. The experiments and meta-analysis identified the importance of several methodological factors in affecting identification, most notably position of the target phoneme.

摘要

相似文献

1
An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):699-725. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.699.
2
Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.音位加工中的词汇效应:促进性还是抑制性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):77-91. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.77.
3
Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: evidence for associative context effects.音素监测与词汇加工:联想语境效应的证据
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):134-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03197063.
4
Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.口语单词计划对语音识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):900-13. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.900.
5
Is phonological encoding in naming influenced by literacy?命名中的语音编码是否受读写能力的影响?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Sep;36(5):341-60. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9048-1.
6
Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.语后聋人工耳蜗植入者语音学习的神经关联
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):514-28. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000287.
7
Testing the speech unit hypothesis with the primed matching task: phoneme categories are perceptually basic.用启动匹配任务检验言语单元假设:音素类别在知觉上是基本的。
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Jun;53(6):601-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03211737.
8
Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.通过唇读语音与词汇信息对语音类别进行重新校准。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1483-94. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1483.
9
Strategic deployment of orthographic knowledge in phoneme detection.正字法知识在音素检测中的策略性运用。
Lang Speech. 2010;53(Pt 3):307-20. doi: 10.1177/0023830910371445.
10
Prediction of Agreement and Phonetic Overlap Shape Sublexical Identification.
Lang Speech. 2017 Sep;60(3):356-376. doi: 10.1177/0023830916650714. Epub 2016 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.词汇对范畴性言语感知的影响是由颞顶叶回路驱动的。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr 1;33(5):840-852. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01678.
2
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech.词汇感知整合影响言语的运动适应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 17;8:208. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208. eCollection 2014.
4
Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.视觉言语在支持言语感知方面的作用与词汇语境不同。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1479-90. doi: 10.1037/a0036656. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
5
Perceptual learning of speech under optimal and adverse conditions.在最佳和不利条件下的语音感知学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):200-17. doi: 10.1037/a0033182. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
6
Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language.手部形状监测:美国手语处理中语言和感知因素的评估。
Lang Cogn Process. 2012 Jan 1;27(1):117-141. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.549667. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
7
The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing.词汇知识的皮质组织:口语处理的双重词汇模型。
Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):273-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Facilitated auditory detection for speech sounds.促进言语声音的听觉检测。
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 26;2:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00176. eCollection 2011.
9
The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants.发音变体的词汇激活强度及时程
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):896-910. doi: 10.1037/a0013160.
10
Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.注意力对词汇影响言语感知强度的作用:行为实验与计算机制
Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;32(2):398-417. doi: 10.1080/03640210701864063.