Siu A L, Ouslander J G, Osterweil D, Reuben D B, Hays R D
UCLA Multicampus Program of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 90024.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90108-d.
We evaluated the responsiveness of measures of function in admissions to a long-term care facility. Between baseline and follow-up assessment, one-fifth or more of the subjects either worsened or improved in most aspects of reported function. We compared two measures of self-reported function (COOP charts and a short-form survey). Convergent validity was observed for changes in pain, social health, and mental health (r = 0.39-0.74), but not for physical functioning. Although the short-form physical function measure discriminated worsening on several performance-based external criteria of physical functioning (area under ROC curves up to 0.82), the COOP and other measures of physical functioning were less likely to do so. All physical function measures were less responsive for detecting improvement. Clinicians and investigators intending to monitor change in function must consider the responsiveness of their measures.
我们评估了入住长期护理机构时功能指标的反应性。在基线评估和随访评估之间,五分之一或更多的受试者在报告的功能的大多数方面出现了恶化或改善。我们比较了两种自我报告功能的指标(COOP图表和简短调查问卷)。观察到疼痛、社会健康和心理健康变化的收敛效度(r = 0.39 - 0.74),但身体功能方面未观察到。尽管简短身体功能指标在基于表现的几个身体功能外部标准上能够区分恶化情况(ROC曲线下面积高达0.82),但COOP及其他身体功能指标区分恶化情况的可能性较小。所有身体功能指标在检测改善情况时反应性较低。打算监测功能变化的临床医生和研究人员必须考虑其所用指标的反应性。