• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终期间的维持生命治疗:人们想要什么?

Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what?

作者信息

Garrett J M, Harris R P, Norburn J K, Patrick D L, Danis M

机构信息

Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7490.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jul;8(7):361-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600073.

DOI:10.1007/BF02600073
PMID:8410396
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient characteristics associated with the desire for life-sustaining treatments in the event of terminal illness.

DESIGN

In-person survey from October 1986 to June 1988.

SETTING

13 internal medicine and family practices in North Carolina.

PATIENTS

2,536 patients (46% of those eligible) aged 65 years and older who were continuing care patients of participating practices, enrolled in Medicare. The patients were slightly older than the 65+ general population, 61% female, and 69% white, and most had one or more chronic illnesses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors asked the patients whether they would want each of six different treatments (hospitalization, intensive care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, surgery, artificial ventilation, or tube feeding) if they were to have a terminal illness. The authors combined responses into three categories ranging from the desire for more treatment to the desire for less treatment. After adjustment for other factors, 53% of women chose less treatment compared with 43% of men; 35% of blacks vs 15% of whites and 23% of the less well educated vs 15% of the better educated expressed the desire for more treatment. High depression scores also were associated with the desire for more treatment (26% for depressed vs 18% for others).

CONCLUSION

Patients' choices for care in the event of terminal illness relate to an intricate set of demographic, educational, and cultural factors. These results should not be used as a shortcut to determine patient preferences for care, but may provide new insights into the basis for patients' preferences. In discussing choices for future life-sustaining care, physicians need to explore with each individual the basis for his or her choices.

摘要

目的

确定与绝症患者维持生命治疗意愿相关的患者特征。

设计

1986年10月至1988年6月进行的面对面调查。

地点

北卡罗来纳州的13家内科和家庭医疗诊所。

患者

2536名65岁及以上的患者(占符合条件者的46%),他们是参与诊所的持续护理患者,参加了医疗保险。这些患者比65岁以上的普通人群稍年长,61%为女性,69%为白人,且大多数患有一种或多种慢性病。

测量与主要结果

作者询问患者,如果他们身患绝症,是否希望接受六种不同治疗中的每一种(住院治疗、重症监护、心肺复苏、手术、人工通气或鼻饲)。作者将回答合并为三类,范围从希望接受更多治疗到希望接受更少治疗。在对其他因素进行调整后,53%的女性选择接受更少治疗,而男性为43%;35%的黑人与15%的白人、23%受教育程度较低者与15%受教育程度较高者表示希望接受更多治疗。高抑郁评分也与希望接受更多治疗相关(抑郁者为26%,其他人则为18%)。

结论

绝症患者的护理选择与一系列复杂的人口统计学、教育和文化因素相关。这些结果不应被用作确定患者护理偏好的捷径,但可能为患者偏好的依据提供新的见解。在讨论未来维持生命护理的选择时,医生需要与每位患者探讨其选择的依据。

相似文献

1
Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what?临终期间的维持生命治疗:人们想要什么?
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jul;8(7):361-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600073.
2
Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments.
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 1;120(7):567-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-7-199404010-00006.
3
Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.老年住院重症成人患者护理偏好、治疗决策及临床结局的年龄差异:“支持性治疗和姑息治疗患者导向研究”(SUPPORT)的经验教训
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S176-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03129.x.
4
Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.患者年龄与对重症住院成年患者停止维持生命治疗的决策。SUPPORT研究组。了解治疗转归和风险的预后及偏好研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jan 19;130(2):116-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-2-199901190-00005.
5
Stability of patient preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments.
Chest. 1990 Jan;97(1):159-64. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.1.159.
6
Life-sustaining treatment and assisted death choices in depressed older patients.老年抑郁症患者的维持生命治疗与辅助死亡选择
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Feb;49(2):153-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49036.x.
7
Families' and physicians' predictions of dialysis patients' preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments in Japan.日本家庭和医生对透析患者在维持生命治疗方面偏好的预测。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jan;47(1):122-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.09.030.
8
The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older.80岁及以上住院患者维持生命治疗的使用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 May;50(5):930-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50222.x.
9
Use of life-sustaining care for the elderly.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Aug;39(8):772-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb02699.x.
10
Is experience a good teacher? How interns and attending physicians understand patients' choices for end-of-life care. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.经验是一位好老师吗?实习医生和主治医生如何理解患者对临终关怀的选择。支持研究调查人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
Med Decis Making. 1997 Apr-Jun;17(2):217-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700213.

引用本文的文献

1
CARE ALTERNATIVES IN PRISON SYSTEMS: Factors Influencing End-of-Life Treatment Selection.监狱系统中的护理选择:影响临终治疗选择的因素
Crim Justice Behav. 2009 Jun;36(6):620-634. doi: 10.1177/0093854809334442. Epub 2009 May 7.
2
Factors Associated with Do Not Resuscitate Status and Palliative Care in Hospitalized Patients: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.住院患者不进行心肺复苏状态和姑息治疗的相关因素:一项全国住院患者样本分析
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Aug 5;5(1):331-339. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0030. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Mortality, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.自评健康状况:老年人死亡率的一个预测指标。
Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.800.
2
The Edgecombe County (NC) High Blood Pressure Control Program: II. Barriers to the use of medical care among hypertensives.北卡罗来纳州埃奇科姆县高血压控制项目:II. 高血压患者获得医疗服务的障碍
Am J Public Health. 1984 May;74(5):468-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.5.468.
3
Toward an operational definition of health.迈向健康的操作性定义。
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者死亡率、迟发性脑缺血及功能预后的性别差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 9;13(10):2781. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102781.
4
Limitation of life sustaining measures in neurocritical care: sex, timing, and advance directive.神经重症监护中生命维持措施的限制:性别、时机和预先指示。
J Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 16;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00714-y.
5
Health Care System Distrust, Race, and Surrogate Decision-Making Regarding Code Status.医疗保健系统中的不信任、种族与关于抢救状态的替代决策
Health Equity. 2022 Oct 27;6(1):809-818. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0044. eCollection 2022.
6
Association of perceived life satisfaction with attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment among the elderly in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.韩国老年人对生活满意度与维持生命治疗态度的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 17;21(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01072-6.
7
Greater preferences for death in hospital and mechanical ventilation at the end of life among non-whites recently diagnosed with cancer.非白人癌症患者在生命末期更倾向于选择在医院死亡和使用机械通气。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6555-6564. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06226-5. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Predictors of Surrogate Decision Makers Selecting Life-Sustaining Therapy for Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients: An Analysis of US Population Survey Data.预测严重急性脑损伤患者的替代决策制定者选择生命维持治疗的因素:美国人口调查数据分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Oct;35(2):468-479. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01200-9. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
Gender and palliative care: a call to arms.性别与姑息治疗:战斗的号角
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2020 Oct 15;14:2632352420957997. doi: 10.1177/2632352420957997. eCollection 2020.
10
Psychological Attachment Orientations of Surrogate Decision-Makers and Goals-of-Care Decisions for Brain Injury Patients in ICUs.重症监护病房中脑损伤患者的替代决策者的心理依恋取向与医疗照护目标决策
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jul 6;2(7):e0151. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000151. eCollection 2020 Jul.
J Health Soc Behav. 1973 Mar;14(1):6-23.
4
Probable death: perspective of the elderly.可能的死亡:老年人的视角。
South Med J. 1985 Jul;78(7):851-3. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198507000-00019.
5
A new perspective on the relationships among race, social class, and psychological distress.关于种族、社会阶层和心理困扰之间关系的新视角。
J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Jun;27(2):107-15.
6
Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment.
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Aug;146(8):1613-5.
7
Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.患者及其家属对医疗重症监护的偏好。
JAMA. 1988 Aug 12;260(6):797-802.
8
Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.医生针对白人和少数族裔患者的预防实践模式差异。
J Community Health. 1988 Spring;13(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01321480.
9
Access to medical care for black and white Americans. A matter of continuing concern.美国黑人和白人获得医疗保健的情况。这一直是人们持续关注的问题。
JAMA. 1989 Jan 13;261(2):278-81.
10
Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients.住院患者对生命支持的态度:对200名内科住院患者的调查
Am J Med. 1989 Jun;86(6 Pt 1):645-8.