Suppr超能文献

急性胰腺炎的干预时机。

Timing of intervention in acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Johnson C D

机构信息

University Surgical Unit, Southampton General Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1993 Jul;69(813):509-15. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.813.509.

Abstract

This review examines the appropriate timing of intervention in acute pancreatitis. In gallstone pancreatitis, it is now clear that cholecystectomy during the primary admission carries no greater risk of complications than delayed cholecystectomy and enables earlier recovery to normal activity. This course of action pre-empts a second, possibly fatal attack of acute pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy should be done after the acute phase has settled, before discharge from hospital. Patients with gallstones should now be offered endoscopic sphincterotomy within 48 hours of admission. This approach is safe, and reduces the risk of complications. When complications develop, early necrosectomy is only indicated if conservative measures fail. Delayed (> 10 days) necrosectomy is appropriate if there is evidence of sepsis, or clinical failure to improve. Pancreatic pseudocysts can often be managed expectantly; a high proportion will resolve spontaneously. After a delay of 12 weeks, persistent cysts require evaluation by endoscopic pancreatography, which gives crucial information in the choice between percutaneous or surgical drainage of the pseudocyst. A patient with pancreatitis is usually treated under the care of a surgeon, who has traditionally taken the decision on the timing of any intervention, and has performed such intervention at open operation. Recently, the development of alternative techniques has enabled the surgeon to call on the skills of his colleagues in endoscopy and interventional radiology. However, the availability of these alternatives to surgery should not affect the timing of intervention unless it can be clearly shown that such a change in timing combined with the minimally invasive technique can improve the outcome for the patient. Intervention may be required to deal with gallstones in the gallbladder or in the bile duct, to deal with, or ideally prevent, the deleterious systemic effects of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis, or to drain a peripancreatic abscess. Peripancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic pseudocysts may also require either internal or external drainage to relieve symptoms or prevent complications.

摘要

本综述探讨了急性胰腺炎干预的合适时机。在胆石性胰腺炎中,目前已经明确,初次住院期间行胆囊切除术与延迟胆囊切除术相比,并发症风险并无增加,且能使患者更早恢复正常活动。这一做法可避免急性胰腺炎再次发作,而再次发作可能是致命的。胆囊切除术应在急性期过后、出院前进行。胆石症患者应在入院48小时内接受内镜括约肌切开术。这种方法是安全的,可降低并发症风险。当出现并发症时,只有在保守治疗失败的情况下才考虑早期坏死组织清除术。如果有脓毒症证据或临床症状无改善,延迟(>10天)坏死组织清除术是合适的。胰腺假性囊肿通常可采取观察等待的方式处理;很大一部分会自行消退。延迟12周后,持续存在的囊肿需要通过内镜胰管造影进行评估,这对于在经皮引流或手术引流假性囊肿之间做出选择提供关键信息。胰腺炎患者通常在外科医生的照料下接受治疗,传统上由外科医生决定任何干预的时机,并在开放手术中进行此类干预。最近,替代技术的发展使外科医生能够借助内镜和介入放射学同事的技能。然而,这些手术替代方法的可用性不应影响干预时机,除非能够明确表明这种时机改变与微创技术相结合可改善患者的预后。干预可能需要处理胆囊或胆管中的胆石,处理或理想情况下预防胰腺及胰周坏死的有害全身影响,或引流胰周脓肿。胰周液体积聚和胰腺假性囊肿也可能需要进行内引流或外引流以缓解症状或预防并发症。

相似文献

1
Timing of intervention in acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎的干预时机。
Postgrad Med J. 1993 Jul;69(813):509-15. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.813.509.
3
Management of gallstone pancreatitis.胆结石性胰腺炎的管理
Adv Surg. 2006;40:265-84. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2006.06.005.

本文引用的文献

7
Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis.胆结石迁移作为急性胰腺炎的一个病因
N Engl J Med. 1974 Feb 28;290(9):484-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197402282900904.
9
Surgical aspects of pancreatic abscess.
Br J Surg. 1986 Aug;73(8):644-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730823.
10
Surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis.坏死性胰腺炎的外科干预
Gastroenterology. 1986 Aug;91(2):479-81. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90587-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验